Serological and molecular prevalence of Brucella spp. among livestock species in Rajasthan, India

被引:7
作者
Meena, Dhram Singh [1 ]
Sharma, Lata [1 ]
Bishnoi, Jyoti [1 ]
Soni, Monika [1 ]
Jeph, Nirmal Kumar [1 ]
Galav, Vikas [2 ]
Sharma, Sandeep Kumar [3 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Vet Educ & Res, Ctr Diag Surveillance & Response Zoonot Dis CDSRZ, Dept Vet Med, Jaipur, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Vet Educ & Res, Dept Vet Pathol, Jaipur, India
[3] Post Grad Inst Vet Educ & Res, Dept Vet Microbiol & Biotechnol, Jaipur, India
关键词
Brucella; prevalence; seroprevalence; diagnosis; livestock; RISK-FACTORS; BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS; SEROPREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; ASSAY; INFECTION; HEALTH; STATE; ELISA;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2023.1157211
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
A seroprevalence and molecular study was carried out in six districts of the state of Rajasthan, India to detect brucellosis in major livestock species. This study involves the testing of 3,245 livestock samples using the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (i-ELISA), and genus-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) markers for molecular diagnosis of the disease. In the tested samples, seroprevalence was 5.06% (CI: 1.96-8.15) using the RBPT test and 6.88% (CI: 1.98-11.78) using the i-ELISA test, while the cumulative seroprevalence (RBPT and i-ELISA) was 3.63% (CI: 0.44-6.83). The prevalence of the disease was 1.27% (CI: 0.56-3.11) when tested using molecular markers. The highest prevalence of brucellosis was detected in Cattle (7.00, 3.22%), followed by camels (5.50, 2.50%), buffalo (2.66, 0.00%), sheep (2.43, 0.41%), and goats (0.58, 0.23%) when serological (cumulative) and molecular diagnosis were considered preferred methods of detection. Cattle (3.22%) and camels (2.50%) also showed a high prevalence of disease when tested using molecular markers. The results of this study reveal that cattle, camel, and sheep brucellosis is prevalent in the study areas.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Alton G G, 1967, Monogr Ser World Health Organ, V55, P1
[2]  
Alton G G., 1996, Medical Microbiology
[3]   BASIC LOCAL ALIGNMENT SEARCH TOOL [J].
ALTSCHUL, SF ;
GISH, W ;
MILLER, W ;
MYERS, EW ;
LIPMAN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 215 (03) :403-410
[4]   Differentiation of Brucella abortus and B. melitensis biovars using PCR-RFLP and REP-PCR [J].
Amoupour, M. ;
Nezamzadeh, F. ;
Bialvaei, A. Z. ;
Sedighi, M. ;
Jazi, F. M. ;
Alikhani, M. Y. ;
Mirnejad, R. .
NEW MICROBES AND NEW INFECTIONS, 2019, 32
[5]   Seroprevalence of Brucellosis in Western Rajasthan: A Study from a Tertiary Care Centre [J].
Bansal, Yashik ;
Aggarwal, Alisha ;
Gadepalli, Ravisekhar ;
Nag, Vijaya Lakshmi .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (03) :426-429
[6]   Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in livestock in the wildlife and livestock interface area of Similipal Biosphere Reserve, India [J].
Behera, Sujit Kumar ;
Das, Deepanker ;
Balasubramani, K. ;
Chellappan, Savitha ;
Rajaram, Kaushik ;
Mohanta, Himanshu Kumar ;
Nina, Praveen Balabaskaran .
VETERINARY WORLD, 2020, 13 (03) :465-470
[7]   Development of probe-based real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detection of Brucella [J].
Bhat, I. A. ;
Mashooq, M. ;
Kumar, D. ;
Varshney, R. ;
Rathore, R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 126 (05) :1332-1339
[8]  
Brucellosis Vaccination [Internet], 2022, DEP AN HUSB DAIR
[9]  
Crecelius Elena M, 2021, J Spec Oper Med, V21, P98, DOI [10.55460/qmqr-ti7j, 10.55460/QMQR-TI7J]
[10]  
DAHD, 2022, ANN REP 2021 2022