Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovaries syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilisation

被引:0
作者
Hussein, Mohamed [1 ]
Sayed, Abdullah [1 ]
Eldaly, Ashraf [1 ]
AlSawaf, Ahmed H. [1 ]
Eid, Marwa M. [1 ]
Abdel-Rasheed, Mazen [2 ]
Rashwan, Ahmed S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Obstet & Gynaecol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Natl Res Ctr, Reprod Hlth Res Dept, 33 El Buhouth St, Cairo 12622, Egypt
关键词
Polycystic ovarian syndrome; Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; Fresh embryo transfer; Frozen embryo transfer; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; CRITERIA; IVF/ICSI; CYCLES;
D O I
10.1186/s43043-023-00139-5
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundPolycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) cases undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) are widely at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation; therefore, elective freezing of all embryos to be transferred in a later cycle is preferred. We aimed to compare the pregnancy outcome between the fresh and the frozen embryo transfer (ET) in PCOS cases undergoing IVF with antagonist ovarian induction using human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) as a trigger.MethodsIn this prospective randomised study, 110 infertile PCOS women underwent fresh ET (group A) or frozen ET (group B) with GnRH-antagonist protocol. The primary outcome was the chemical and clinical pregnancy rates. The secondary outcomes were the ongoing pregnancy rate, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate, pregnancy loss rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and congenital anomalies rate.ResultsThere was no significant difference between both groups regarding chemical pregnancy rate (44.23% vs 47.27%, P = 0.752), clinical pregnancy rate (42.31% vs 43.64%, P = 0.89), ongoing pregnancy rate (38.46% vs 41.82%, P = 0.723), pregnancy loss rate (17.39% vs 15.4%, P = 1), ectopic pregnancy rate (1.92% vs 0%, P = 0.486) and anomaly malformation rate (4.35% vs 3.85%, P = 1). On the other hand, the incidence of OHSS was significantly less in group B than in group A (3.64% vs 19.23%, P = 0.011), and the OHSS grade was less severe in group B than in group A (P = 0.033). However, there was no statistically significant difference between both regarding the need for hospitalisation (P = 0.111), ICU admission (P = 0.486), and ascites tapping (P = 0.486).ConclusionsUnder GnRH-antagonist protocol, frozen ET has the upper hand in PCOS undergoing IVF treatment for infertility, as it protects against OHSS and decreases its severity.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovaries syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilisation
    Mohamed Hussein
    Abdullah Sayed
    Ashraf Eldaly
    Ahmed H. AlSawaf
    Marwa M. Eid
    Mazen Abdel-Rasheed
    Ahmed S. Rashwan
    Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 28
  • [2] A Comparative Study of Fresh versus Frozen Embryo Transfer and their Outcomes in Patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
    Sawal, Anupama
    Yadgire, Geetanjali
    Thute, Preeti
    Chaudhary, Kirti
    Bokariya, Pradeep
    Fulmali, Darshana
    JOURNAL OF THE ANATOMICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2024, 73 (02) : 160 - 166
  • [3] IVF Transfer of Fresh or Frozen Embryos in Women without Polycystic Ovaries
    Vuong, Lan N.
    Dang, Vinh Q.
    Ho, Tuong M.
    Huynh, Bao G.
    Ha, Duc T.
    Pham, Toan D.
    Nguyen, Linh K.
    Norman, Robert J.
    Mol, Ben W.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (02) : 137 - 147
  • [4] Obstetric complications after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: results from a randomized trial
    Zhang, Bo
    Wei, Daimin
    Legro, Richard S.
    Shi, Yuhua
    Li, Jing
    Zhang, Lin
    Hong, Yan
    Sun, Gang
    Zhang, Ting
    Li, Weiping
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (02) : 324 - 329
  • [5] Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes and Obstetric Complications Between Frozen Embryo Transfer and Fresh Embryo Transfer in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome A Meta-Analysis
    Cao, Lijuan
    Shi, Yu
    Yang, Danni
    Wu, Jiahui
    Jiang, Xuefeng
    Xia, Xi
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 65 (9-10) : 277 - 285
  • [6] Fresh or Frozen Embryo Transfer in In Vitro Fertilization: An Update
    Pereira, Nigel
    Petrini, Allison C.
    Hancock, Kolbe L.
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 62 (02) : 293 - 299
  • [7] Pro: Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer. Is frozen embryo transfer the future?
    Venetis, Christos A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (07) : 1379 - 1387
  • [8] Cumulative live-birth rate in women with polycystic ovary syndrome or isolated polycystic ovaries undergoing in-vitro fertilisation treatment
    Li, Hang Wun Raymond
    Lee, Vivian Chi Yan
    Lau, Estella Yee Lan
    Yeung, William Shu Biu
    Ho, Pak Chung
    Ernest Hung Yu Ng
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2014, 31 (02) : 205 - 211
  • [9] Clinical outcomes of frozen embryo versus fresh embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Wanlin
    Xiao, Xifeng
    Zhang, Junyan
    Wang, Wenjun
    Wu, Jing
    Peng, Ling
    Wang, Xiaohong
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (02) : 259 - 272
  • [10] Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roque, Matheus
    Lattes, Karinna
    Serra, Sandra
    Sola, Ivan
    Geber, Selmo
    Carreras, Ramon
    Angel Checa, Miguel
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (01) : 156 - 162