Decision-making methodology by using multi-expert knowledge for uncertain environments: green metric assessment of universities

被引:16
|
作者
Karasan, Ali [1 ]
Gundogdu, Fatma Kutlu [2 ]
Aydin, Serhat [2 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Air Force Acad, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Sustainability; Fuzzy inference systems; Cognitive maps; Intuitionistic fuzzy sets; DEMATEL; VIKOR; DEMATEL METHOD; FUZZY; SUSTAINABILITY; VIKOR; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-022-02321-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Campus sustainability and climate change reduction have become a significant global concern for university administrators in recent days. Several evaluation systems of universities exist, and UI GreenMetric World University is one of the most used ranking one among them. The goal is to provide an image of current conditions relating to the green campus and sustainability of universities worldwide. The ranking system uses six main criteria and 39 sub-criteria and a numeric scoring system to evaluate universities. Unfortunately, collecting a numeric datum is not always easy for decision-makers. Decision-makers need a system using human judgments. For this aim, we proposed a new fuzzy ranking system based on a multi-stage decision-making model including DEMATEL, Cognitive maps, VIKOR, and Fuzzy inference systems. The proposed model uses 18 different criteria collected from UI GreenMetric World University ranking methodology. It captures the qualitative factors of the ranking system. To show the applicability of the method, we applied the proposed method to determine the universities' green index. The sensitivity analysis is also performed by changing decision-makers' weights. The results demonstrate that the proposed methodology is a useful and sensitive tool to calculate the green index of the universities with fuzzy linguistic expressions.
引用
收藏
页码:7393 / 7422
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision-making methodology by using multi-expert knowledge for uncertain environments: green metric assessment of universities
    Ali Karasan
    Fatma Kutlu Gündoǧdu
    Serhat Aydın
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 7393 - 7422
  • [2] Assessment of distribution center locations using a multi-expert subjective–objective decision-making approach
    Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [4] An approach of talents evaluation based on multi-expert decision-making
    Sun, Yi-xiao
    Song, Lin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2021), 2021, : 3868 - 3871
  • [5] MULTI-EXPERT DECISION MAKING USING LOGICAL AGGREGATION
    Poledica, Ana
    Rakicevic, Aleksandar
    Radojevic, Dragan
    UNCERTAINTY MODELING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 7 : 561 - 566
  • [6] Multi-expert decision-making method for support design in tunneling engineering
    Qiao, CS
    Tian, SF
    MCCI'2000: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MODERN CONCRETE COMPOSITES & INFRASTRUCTURES, VOL II, 2000, : 77 - 82
  • [7] Multi-Expert Decision-Making with Incomplete and Noisy Fuzzy Rules and the Monotone Test
    Kerk, Yi Wen
    Pang, Lie Meng
    Tay, Kai Meng
    Lim, Chee Peng
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2016, : 94 - 101
  • [8] A New Flexible Method for Solving Multi-Expert Multi-Criterion Decision-Making Problems
    Wen, Ta-Chun
    Lai, Hsin-Hung
    Chang, Kuei-Hu
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (13):
  • [9] The Generalized Neutrosophic Cubic Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multi-Expert Decision-Making Method
    Khan, Majid
    Gulistan, Muhammad
    Ali, Mumtaz
    Chammam, Wathek
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (04):
  • [10] Intuitive fuzzy multi-expert & multi-criteria decision making methodology: An application in healthcare industry
    Otay, Irem
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2022, 37 (02): : 1047 - 1062