Do Short Sellers Affect Corporate Innovation? Evidence from a Policy Experiment

被引:6
作者
He, Jie [1 ]
Ren, Xiao [2 ]
Tian, Xuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, Athens, GA USA
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Finance Inst, Sch Management & Econ, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, PBC Sch Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; MANAGERIAL INCENTIVES; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; DARK SIDE; MARKET; INVESTMENT; GOVERNANCE; EQUITY; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1093/rcfs/cfad007
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the effect of short sellers on corporate innovation. To establish causality, we use a policy experiment that exogenously removes the short-selling constraint for a randomly selected subsample of Russell 3000 firms. We find that innovation quality, value, and efficiency of treatment firms improve significantly more than those of control firms surrounding the policy shock. The exposure to patenting-related litigation initiated by short sellers is a plausible underlying mechanism through which short sellers discipline firm managers and enhance innovation. Our paper provides new insights into an unintended real effect of short sellers, specifically their improvement of technological innovation. (JEL G14, G18, G34, K22, O31, O32) Received December 10, 2018; editorial decision February 12, 2023 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet , which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 165
页数:41
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Labor Laws and Innovation [J].
Acharya, Viral V. ;
Baghai, Ramin P. ;
Subramanian, Krishnamurthy V. .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2013, 56 (04) :997-1037
[2]   Wrongful Discharge Laws and Innovation [J].
Acharya, Viral V. ;
Baghai, Ramin P. ;
Subramanian, Krishnamurthy V. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2014, 27 (01) :301-346
[3]   Bankruptcy Codes and Innovation [J].
Acharya, Viral V. ;
Subramanian, Krishnamurthy V. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (12) :4949-4988
[4]   Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bloom, N ;
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Howitt, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (02) :701-728
[5]   Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting [J].
Atanassov, Julian .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (03) :1097-1131
[6]   What Matters in Corporate Governance? [J].
Bebchuk, Lucian ;
Cohen, Alma ;
Ferrell, Allen .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (02) :783-827
[7]   Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions [J].
Bena, Jan ;
Li, Kai .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2014, 69 (05) :1923-1960
[8]   Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Mullainathan, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 111 (05) :1043-1075
[9]  
Bit K., 2015, NEW ENGL J MED
[10]  
Black B. S., 2020, SPECIFICATION CHOICE