Estimation of Leaf Area Index in a Typical Northern Tropical Secondary Monsoon Rainforest by Different Indirect Methods

被引:5
|
作者
Xie, Xiansheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Yuanzheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wuzheng [4 ]
Liao, Nanyan [4 ]
Pan, Weihu [4 ]
Su, Hongxin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanning Normal Univ, Key Lab Environm Change & Resources Use Beibu Gulf, Minist Educ, Nanning 530001, Peoples R China
[2] Nanning Normal Univ, Guangxi Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Intelligent S, Nanning 530001, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Forestry Policy & Informat, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China
[4] Guangxi Fangcheng Golden Camellia Natl Nat Reserve, Fangchenggang 538021, Peoples R China
关键词
effective leaf area index; secondary forests; optical instruments; terrestrial laser scanning; GROUND-BASED MEASUREMENTS; DECIDUOUS FOREST; OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS; SEASONAL-VARIATION; LITTER COLLECTION; GAP FRACTION; MODEL; PLANT; LAI; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/rs15061621
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The leaf area index (LAI) is a crucial indicator for quantifying forest productivity and community ecological processes. Satellite remote sensing can achieve large-scale LAI monitoring, but it needs to be calibrated and validated according to the in situ measurements on the ground. In this study, we attempted to use different indirect methods to measure LAI in a tropical secondary forest. These methods included the LAI-2200 plant canopy analyzer (LAI-2200), Digital Hemispherical Photography (DHP), Tracing Radiation and Architecture of Canopies (TRAC), and Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) (using single-station and multi-station measurements, respectively). Additionally, we tried to correct the measured LAI by obtaining indicators of woody components and clumping effects. The results showed that the LAI of this forest was large, with estimated values of 5.27 +/- 1.16, 3.69 +/- 0.74, 5.86 +/- 1.09, 4.93 +/- 1.33, and 3.87 +/- 0.89 for LAI-2200, DHP, TRAC, TLS multi-station, and TLS single-station, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the different methods. LAI-2200 was significantly correlated with all other methods (p < 0.01), with the strongest correlation with DHP (r = 0.684). TRAC was significantly correlated with TLS single-station (p < 0.01, r = 0.283). TLS multi-station was significantly correlated with TLS single-station (p < 0.05, r = 0.266). With the multi-station measurement method, TLS could maximize the compensation for measurement bias due to the shadowing effects. In general, the clumping index of this forest was 0.94 +/- 0.05, the woody-to-total area ratio was 3.23 +/- 2.22%, and the total correction coefficient was 1.03 +/- 0.07. After correction, the LAI estimates for all methods were slightly higher than before, but there was no significant difference among them. Based on the performance assessment of existing ground-based methods, we hope to enhance the inter-calibration between methods to improve their estimation accuracy under complex forest conditions and advance the validation of remote sensing inversion of the LAI. Moreover, this study also provided a practical reference to promote the application of LiDAR technology in tropical forests.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ESTIMATION OF DECIDUOUS FOREST LEAF-AREA INDEX USING DIRECT AND INDIRECT METHODS
    DUFRENE, E
    BREDA, N
    OECOLOGIA, 1995, 104 (02) : 156 - 162
  • [2] COMPARISON OF THREE INDIRECT FIELD MEASURING METHODS FOR FOREST CANOPY LEAF AREA INDEX ESTIMATION
    Fu, Zhuo
    Wang, Jindi
    Song, Jinling
    Zhou, Hongmin
    Huang, Huaguo
    Chen, Baisong
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 3391 - +
  • [3] Comparison of direct and indirect methods for assessing leaf area index across a tropical rain forest landscape
    Olivas, Paulo C.
    Oberbauer, Steven F.
    Clark, David B.
    Clark, Deborah A.
    Ryan, Michael G.
    O'Brien, Joseph J.
    Ordonez, Harlyn
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2013, 177 : 110 - 116
  • [4] Estimation of Leaf Area Index and Foliage Area Index of Rice using an Indirect Gravimetric Method
    Aschonitis, V. G.
    Papamichail, D. M.
    Lithourgidis, A.
    Fano, E. A.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2014, 45 (13) : 1726 - 1740
  • [5] An indirect method of estimating leaf area index in a tropical deciduous forest of India
    Behera, Soumit K.
    Behera, M. D.
    Tuli, R.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 58 : 356 - 364
  • [6] Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index in VSP-Trained Grapevines Using Plant Area Index
    Doering, Johanna
    Stoll, Manfred
    Kauer, Randolf
    Frisch, Matthias
    Tittmann, Susanne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE, 2014, 65 (01): : 153 - 158
  • [7] An assessment study of three indirect methods for estimating leaf area density and leaf area index of individual trees
    Wei, Shanshan
    Yin, Tiangang
    Dissegna, Maria Angela
    Whittle, Andrew J.
    Ow, Genevieve Lai Fern
    Yusof, Mohamed Lokman Mohd
    Lauret, Nicolas
    Gastellu-Etchegorry, Jean-Philippe
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2020, 292
  • [8] Calibration of two indirect methods for estimating the leaf area index in Eucalyptus plantations
    Giunti Neto, Carmeni Joao
    Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji
    Gentil Otto, Marina Shinkai
    Silva, Sergio Ricardo
    Stape, Jose Luiz
    SCIENTIA FORESTALIS, 2015, 43 (108): : 919 - 930
  • [9] Calibration of two indirect methods for estimating the leaf area index in Eucalyptus plantations
    Neto, Carmeni Joaõ Giunti
    Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji
    Otto, Marina Shinkai Gentil
    Silva, Sergio Ricardo
    Stape, José Luiz
    Scientia Forestalis/Forest Sciences, 2015, 43 (108): : 919 - 930
  • [10] A Comparison of Different Remote Sensors for Ramie Leaf Area Index Estimation
    Fu, Hongyu
    Chen, Jianfu
    Lu, Jianning
    Yue, Yunkai
    Xu, Mingzhi
    Jiao, Xinwei
    Cui, Guoxian
    She, Wei
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):