Teaching Science Using Argumentation-Supported 5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and Conventional Didactic Methods: Differences in the Learning Outcomes of Middle School Students

被引:7
作者
Ha, Vu Thi [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Le Hong [1 ]
Hanh, Nguyen Van [1 ]
Hai, Bui Minh [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Engn Pedag, Hanoi City 100000, Vietnam
[2] Natl Coll Educ Vietnam, Dept Educ Qual Assurance, Hanoi City 100000, Vietnam
关键词
integrated STEM; 5E-based STEM (5E-STEM); argumentation-supported 5E-STEM (A-5E-STEM); conventional didactic methods; learning outcomes; middle school students;
D O I
10.3390/educsci13030247
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
5E-based science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (5E-STEM) education is known to be one of the most used pedagogical models in STEM-oriented science courses for middle school students. However, the 5E model lacks a clear explanation of how STEM subjects are strongly linked in each of its operational "E". In this study, a novel approach was proposed with the use of the argumentation-supported 5E-STEM (A-5E-STEM) model in the science curriculum. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in learning achievements, learning motivation, learning interest, and higher-order thinking skills of middle school students between teaching science using A-5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and conventional didactic methods. A semi-experimental study with post-test only non-equivalent groups design was used. A "Separating Mixtures" unit in the 6th grade Natural Science curriculum was designed with A-5E-STEM and 5E-STEM model orientation. The participants were three 6th grade classes with a total of one hundred and twenty students at a public middle school in Hanoi City, Vietnam. The first experimental group was taught science using the A-5E-STEM model, the second experimental group was taught science using the 5E-STEM model, and a control group was taught the science unit with conventional didactic methods. A post-test was used to collect data on learning achievement, and questionnaires were used to collect data on learning motivation, interest, and higher-order thinking skills of middle school students in the science curriculum. The findings showed that the effect of teaching science using the A-5E-STEM model on learning achievement, motivation, interest, and higher-order thinking skills of middle school students was significantly superior to that of the 5E-STEM model and conventional didactic methods. Therefore, science teachers are expected to increase the use of the A-5E-STEM model in their related curriculum.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[31]   EFFECT OF A STEM-ORIENTED COURSE ON STUDENTS' MARINE SCIENCE MOTIVATION, INTEREST, AND ACHIEVEMENTS [J].
Tsai, Liang-Ting ;
Chang, Cheng-Chieh ;
Cheng, Hao-Ti .
JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2021, 20 (01) :134-145
[32]  
Ultay N., 2020, Journal of Science Learning, V3, P156
[33]  
Williams LJ, 2010, ENCYCL RES DES, V218, P840, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412961288.N154
[34]  
Yildirim B., 2018, Cypriot J. Educ. Sci, V13, P259, DOI [10.18844/cjes.v13i3.3457, DOI 10.18844/CJES.V13I3.3457]
[35]   Integrating Nanotechnology in the Science Curriculum for Elementary High-Ability Students in Taiwan: Evidenced-Based Lessons [J].
Yu, Hsiao-Ping ;
Jen, Enyi .
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2020, 42 (01) :38-48