Teaching Science Using Argumentation-Supported 5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and Conventional Didactic Methods: Differences in the Learning Outcomes of Middle School Students

被引:7
作者
Ha, Vu Thi [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Le Hong [1 ]
Hanh, Nguyen Van [1 ]
Hai, Bui Minh [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Engn Pedag, Hanoi City 100000, Vietnam
[2] Natl Coll Educ Vietnam, Dept Educ Qual Assurance, Hanoi City 100000, Vietnam
关键词
integrated STEM; 5E-based STEM (5E-STEM); argumentation-supported 5E-STEM (A-5E-STEM); conventional didactic methods; learning outcomes; middle school students;
D O I
10.3390/educsci13030247
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
5E-based science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (5E-STEM) education is known to be one of the most used pedagogical models in STEM-oriented science courses for middle school students. However, the 5E model lacks a clear explanation of how STEM subjects are strongly linked in each of its operational "E". In this study, a novel approach was proposed with the use of the argumentation-supported 5E-STEM (A-5E-STEM) model in the science curriculum. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in learning achievements, learning motivation, learning interest, and higher-order thinking skills of middle school students between teaching science using A-5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and conventional didactic methods. A semi-experimental study with post-test only non-equivalent groups design was used. A "Separating Mixtures" unit in the 6th grade Natural Science curriculum was designed with A-5E-STEM and 5E-STEM model orientation. The participants were three 6th grade classes with a total of one hundred and twenty students at a public middle school in Hanoi City, Vietnam. The first experimental group was taught science using the A-5E-STEM model, the second experimental group was taught science using the 5E-STEM model, and a control group was taught the science unit with conventional didactic methods. A post-test was used to collect data on learning achievement, and questionnaires were used to collect data on learning motivation, interest, and higher-order thinking skills of middle school students in the science curriculum. The findings showed that the effect of teaching science using the A-5E-STEM model on learning achievement, motivation, interest, and higher-order thinking skills of middle school students was significantly superior to that of the 5E-STEM model and conventional didactic methods. Therefore, science teachers are expected to increase the use of the A-5E-STEM model in their related curriculum.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Acar D., 2018, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, V10, P505, DOI DOI 10.26822/IEJEE.2018438141
[2]  
Batdi V, 2019, INT J EDUC MATH SCI, V7, P382
[3]  
Brown R., 2011, The Technology and Engineering Teacher, V70, P5
[4]  
Bulut B., 2019, Journal of Education and Learning, V8, P89, DOI DOI 10.5539/JEL.V8N3P89
[5]  
Bybee R. W., 2006, The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications
[6]  
Bybee W.R., 2019, Science and Children, V56, P8
[7]   Promoting students' cross-disciplinary performance and higher order thinking: a peer assessment-facilitated STEM approach in a mathematics course [J].
Chang, Di ;
Hwang, Gwo-Jen ;
Chang, Shao-Chen ;
Wang, Sheng-Yuan .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 69 (06) :3281-3306
[8]   WHAT IS COEFFICIENT ALPHA - AN EXAMINATION OF THEORY AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CORTINA, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :98-104
[9]  
Dnmez S., 2021, Journal for STEM Education Research, V5, P78, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00062-2, DOI 10.1007/S41979-021-00062-2]
[10]   The effect of 5E-based STEM education on academic achievement, scientific creativity, and views on the nature of science [J].
Eroglu, Seyide ;
Bektas, Oktay .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2022, 98