Contesting Europe: Eurosceptic Dissent and Integration Polarization in the European Parliament

被引:14
作者
Boerzel, Tanja A. [1 ]
Broniecki, Philipp [2 ]
Hartlapp, Miriam [1 ]
Obholzer, Lukas [3 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Polit Sci, Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Polit Sci, Oslo, Norway
[3] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Adm, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
European Parliament; Euroscepticism; legislative behaviour; roll-call votes; SELECTION BIAS; POLICY; VOTE; NATIONALISM; OPPOSITION; PARTIES;
D O I
10.1111/jcms.13448
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of Eurosceptic contestation within the legislative arena of the European Parliament (EP) from 2009 to 2019. Under what conditions do Eurosceptics vote differently from their Europhile peers? The literatures on European integration, party competition and policy types lead us to expect variation in Eurosceptic contestation across policy areas. Drawing on roll-call votes in the EP, we introduce two new measures of such contestation: Eurosceptic dissent, that is, the extent to which Eurosceptics diverge from the Europhile plurality, and integration polarization, that is, the extent to which Eurosceptics and Europhiles oppose each other as cohesive camps. Our two indicators show that Eurosceptic contestation is particularly pronounced when the EP votes on cultural, distributive and constituent issues. When voting on redistributive policies, in contrast, dissent and polarization are curbed by national and ideological diversity.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1118
页数:19
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Competence versus control: The governor's dilemma [J].
Abbott, Kenneth W. ;
Genschel, Philipp ;
Snidal, Duncan ;
Zangl, Bernhard .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2020, 14 (04) :619-636
[2]   Money Makes the EU Go Round: The Objective Foundations of Conflict in the Council of Ministers [J].
Bailer, Stefanie ;
Mattila, Mikko ;
Schneider, Gerald .
JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2015, 53 (03) :437-456
[3]  
Bakker R., 2020, 1999 - 2019 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File
[4]   Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010 [J].
Bakker, Ryan ;
de Vries, Catherine ;
Edwards, Erica ;
Hooghe, Liesbet ;
Jolly, Seth ;
Marks, Gary ;
Polk, Jonathan ;
Rovny, Jan ;
Steenbergen, Marco ;
Vachudova, Milada Anna .
PARTY POLITICS, 2015, 21 (01) :143-152
[5]   Politicization and rebordering in EU enlargement: membership discourses in European parliaments [J].
Belanger, Marie-Eve ;
Schimmelfennig, Frank .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 28 (03) :407-426
[6]  
Betz H., 1993, Review of Politics, V55, P663, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0034670500018040
[7]   Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste: Agenda Setting and Legislative Voting in Response to the EU Crisis [J].
Blumenau, Jack ;
Lauderdale, Benjamin E. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2018, 80 (02) :462-478
[8]   From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics [J].
Boerzel, Tanja A. ;
Risse, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2018, 25 (01) :83-108
[9]   Eurosceptics in the European Parliament: Exit or Voice? [J].
Brack, Nathalie .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2012, 34 (02) :151-168
[10]   Euroscepticism at the Supranational Level: The Case of the Untidy Right' in the European Parliament [J].
Brack, Nathalie .
JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2013, 51 (01) :85-104