Factors Associated With Cosmetic Outcomes After Treatment With a Novel Form of Breast Intraoperative Radiation Therapy

被引:1
作者
Squeo, Gabriella C. [1 ]
Meneveau, Max O. [1 ]
Varhegyi, Nikole E. [2 ]
Lattimore, Courtney M. [1 ]
Janowski, Einsley [3 ]
Showalter, Timothy N. [3 ]
Showalter, Shayna L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Dept Surg, Sch Med, POB 800709, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Breast cancer; Cosmesis; Intraoperative radiation therapy; Radiation therapy; DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; CANCER; IRRADIATION; RADIOTHERAPY; TRIAL; RATES; CT; REEXCISION; LUMPECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.077
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Precision breast intraoperative radiation therapy (PB-IORT) incorporates computed tomography-guided treatment planning and high dose rate brachytherapy to deliver a single dose of highly conformal radiational therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine factors associated with poor cosmetic outcomes after treatment with PB-IORT.Methods: The study included all consecutive participants enrolled in an ongoing phase II clinical trial that had completed a minimum of 12 mo of follow-up. A poor cosmetic outcome was defined as scoring "fair" or "poor" on the Harvard Cosmesis evaluation, or "some" or "very much" on any of the three general cosmesis categories. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing R.Results: The final cohort included 201 participants, of which 181 (90%) had an overall good/ excellent cosmetic outcome. Group 1 consisted of 162 (81%) participants who reported only excellent/good cosmetic outcomes. Group 2 consisted of 39 (19%) participants who reported some aspect of a poor cosmetic outcome. On multivariable analysis, participants with ductal carcinoma in situ were significantly more likely to experience a poor cosmetic outcome (odds ratio 2.45, 95% confidence interval 1.03-5.82, P = 0.04), and those who received subsequent whole breast irradiation were also more likely to have a poor cosmetic outcome (odds ratio 10.20, 95% confidence interval CI 1.04-99.95, P = 0.04).Conclusions: Patients with need for further radiation after PB-IORT are at increased risk for a poor cosmetic outcome. Larger balloon volume and distance between the skin do not have deleterious effects on cosmetic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 522
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after IORT treatment: evaluation of acute toxicity and cosmesis
    Burgos-Burgos, J.
    Vega, V.
    Macias-Verde, D.
    Gomez, V
    Travieso-Aja, M.
    Travieso, J.
    Vicente, E.
    Santana, C.
    Ospina, J.
    Lara, P. C.
    [J]. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 (01) : 179 - 182
  • [2] Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance
    Camp, ER
    McAuliffe, PF
    Gilroy, JS
    Morris, CG
    Lind, DS
    Mendenhall, NP
    Copeland, EM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2005, 201 (06) : 855 - 861
  • [3] Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery
    Chagpar, A
    Yen, T
    Sahin, A
    Hunt, KK
    Whitman, GJ
    Ames, FC
    Ross, MI
    Meric-Bernstam, F
    Babiera, GV
    Singletary, SE
    Kuerer, HM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 186 (04) : 371 - 377
  • [4] Cosmesis and Breast-Related Quality of Life Outcomes After Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: A Substudy of the TARGIT-A Trial
    Corica, Tammy
    Nowak, Anna K.
    Saunders, Christobel M.
    Bulsara, Max
    Taylor, Mandy
    Vaidya, Jayant S.
    Baum, Michael
    Joseph, David J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (01): : 55 - 64
  • [5] COSMETIC RESULTS FOLLOWING LUMPECTOMY AXILLARY DISSECTION AND RADIOTHERAPY FOR SMALL BREAST CANCERS
    DEWAR, JA
    BENHAMOU, S
    BENHAMOU, E
    ARRIAGADA, R
    PETIT, JY
    FONTAINE, F
    SARRAZIN, D
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 12 (04) : 273 - 280
  • [6] Analysis of breast cosmetic effects 3 years after breast-conserving surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy with and without adjuvant whole breast irradiation
    Falco, Michal
    Masojc, Bartlomiej
    Rolla, Magdalena
    Czekala, Agnieszka
    Milchert-Leszczynska, Marta
    Pietruszewska, Jolanta
    Lewocki, Miroslaw
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (05) : 882 - 887
  • [7] Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer
    Fisher, B
    Anderson, S
    Bryant, J
    Margolese, RG
    Deutsch, M
    Fisher, ER
    Jeong, J
    Wolmark, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) : 1233 - 1241
  • [8] Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A New Standard of Care?
    Forster, Tobias
    Koehler, Clara Victoria Katharina
    Debus, Juergen
    Hoerner-Rieber, Juliane
    [J]. BREAST CARE, 2020, 15 (02) : 136 - 147
  • [9] Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): Where Are We Now?
    Goldberg, Mira
    Whelan, Timothy J.
    [J]. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2020, 12 (04) : 275 - 284
  • [10] Utility of CT imaging in a novel form of high-dose-rate intraoperative breast radiation therapy
    Hassinger, Taryn E.
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Schroen, Anneke T.
    Brenin, David R.
    Berger, Adam C.
    Libby, Bruce
    Showalter, Shayna L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 62 (06) : 835 - 840