Cross-Domain Topic Classification for Political Texts

被引:24
作者
Osnabruegge, Moritz [1 ]
Ash, Elliott [2 ]
Morelli, Massimo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Sch Govt & Int Affairs, Durham, England
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Ctr Law & Econ, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Bocconi Univ, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Milan, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
cross-domain classification; supervised learning; text analysis; manifesto corpus; parliamentary speeches; electoral reform; debate participation; PARTY POSITIONS; POLICY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1017/pan.2021.37
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
We introduce and assess the use of supervised learning in cross-domain topic classification. In this approach, an algorithm learns to classify topics in a labeled source corpus and then extrapolates topics in an unlabeled target corpus from another domain. The ability to use existing training data makes this method significantly more efficient than within-domain supervised learning. It also has three advantages over unsupervised topic models: the method can be more specifically targeted to a research question and the resulting topics are easier to validate and interpret. We demonstrate the method using the case of labeled party platforms (source corpus) and unlabeled parliamentary speeches (target corpus). In addition to the standard within-domain error metrics, we further validate the cross-domain performance by labeling a subset of target-corpus documents. We find that the classifier accurately assigns topics in the parliamentary speeches, although accuracy varies substantially by topic. We also propose tools diagnosing cross-domain classification. To illustrate the usefulness of the method, we present two case studies on how electoral rules and the gender of parliamentarians influence the choice of speech topics.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 80
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Understanding Delegation Through Machine Learning: A Method and Application to the European Union [J].
Anastasopoulos, L. Jason ;
Bertelli, Anthony M. .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2020, 114 (01) :291-301
[2]   When Do Women Speak? A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Gender in Legislative Debates [J].
Back, Hanna ;
Debus, Marc .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2019, 67 (03) :576-596
[3]   Automated Text Classification of News Articles: A Practical Guide [J].
Barbera, Pablo ;
Boydstun, Amber E. ;
Linn, Suzanna ;
McMahon, Ryan ;
Nagler, Jonathan .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 29 (01) :19-42
[4]  
Baumgartner Frank R., 2005, The Politics of Attention. How Government Prioritizes Problems
[5]   Crowd-sourced Text Analysis: Reproducible and Agile Production of Political Data [J].
Benoit, Kenneth ;
Conway, Drew ;
Lauderdale, Benjamin E. ;
Laver, Michael ;
Mikhaylov, Slava .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2016, 110 (02) :278-295
[6]   Latent Dirichlet allocation [J].
Blei, DM ;
Ng, AY ;
Jordan, MI .
JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2003, 3 (4-5) :993-1022
[7]   Party Policy Diffusion [J].
Bohmelt, Tobias ;
Ezrow, Lawrence ;
Lehrer, Roni ;
Ward, Hugh .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2016, 110 (02) :397-410
[8]  
Budge Ian., 2001, MAPPING POLICY PREFE
[9]   Using Supervised Machine Learning to Code Policy Issues: Can Classifiers Generalize across Contexts? [J].
Burscher, Bjorn ;
Vliegenthart, Rens ;
de Vreese, Claes H. .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 659 (01) :122-131
[10]   From Pork to Policy: The Rise of Programmatic Campaigning in Japanese Elections [J].
Catalinac, Amy .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2016, 78 (01) :1-18