Conformer Generation for Structure-Based Drug Design: How Many and How Good?

被引:20
作者
McNutt, Andrew T. [1 ]
Bisiriyu, Fatimah [2 ]
Song, Sophia [3 ]
Vyas, Ananya [4 ]
Hutchison, Geoffrey R. [5 ,6 ]
Koes, David Ryan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Computat & Syst Biol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Neighborhood Acad, Pittsburgh, PA 15206 USA
[3] Upper St Clair High Sch, Pittsburgh, PA 15241 USA
[4] Taylor Allderdice High Sch, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Chem, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Chem & Petr Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DOCKING; OPTIMIZATION; COLLECTION; EFFICIENT; DATABASE;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01245
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Conformer generation, the assignment of realistic 3D coordinates to a small molecule, is fundamental to structure-based drug design. Conformational ensembles are required for rigid-body matching algorithms, such as shape-based or pharmacophore approaches, and even methods that treat the ligand flexibly, such as docking, are dependent on the quality of the provided conformations due to not sampling all degrees of freedom (e.g., only sampling torsions). Here, we empirically elucidate some general principles about the size, diversity, and quality of the conformational ensembles needed to get the best performance in common structure-based drug discovery tasks. In many cases, our findings may parallel "common knowledge" well-known to practitioners of the field. Nonetheless, we feel that it is valuable to quantify these conformational effects while reproducing and expanding upon previous studies. Specifically, we investigate the performance of a state-of-the-art generative deep learning approach versus a more classical geometry-based approach, the effect of energy minimization as a postprocessing step, the effect of ensemble size (maximum number of conformers), and construction (filtering by root-mean-square deviation for diversity) and how these choices influence the ability to recapitulate bioactive conformations and perform pharmacophore screening and molecular docking.
引用
收藏
页码:6598 / 6607
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[11]   High-Quality Dataset of Protein-Bound Ligand Conformations and Its Application to Benchmarking Conformer Ensemble Generators [J].
Friedrich, Nils-Ole ;
Meyder, Agnes ;
Kops, Christina de Bruyn ;
Sommer, Kai ;
Flachsenberg, Florian ;
Rarey, Matthias ;
Kirchmair, Johannes .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2017, 57 (03) :529-539
[12]   Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy [J].
Friesner, RA ;
Banks, JL ;
Murphy, RB ;
Halgren, TA ;
Klicic, JJ ;
Mainz, DT ;
Repasky, MP ;
Knoll, EH ;
Shelley, M ;
Perry, JK ;
Shaw, DE ;
Francis, P ;
Shenkin, PS .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (07) :1739-1749
[13]  
Ganea OE, 2021, ADV NEUR IN, V34
[14]   Crystallography Open Database (COD): an open-access collection of crystal structures and platform for world-wide collaboration [J].
Grazulis, Saulius ;
Daskevic, Adriana ;
Merkys, Andrius ;
Chateigner, Daniel ;
Lutterotti, Luca ;
Quiros, Miguel ;
Serebryanaya, Nadezhda R. ;
Moeck, Peter ;
Downs, Robert T. ;
Le Bail, Armel .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (D1) :D420-D427
[15]   Conformation Generation: The State of the Art [J].
Hawkins, Paul C. D. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2017, 57 (08) :1747-1756
[16]  
Jing B., 2021, INT C LEARN REPR
[17]  
Jing Bowen, 2022, ADV NEUR IN
[18]   Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications [J].
Kitchen, DB ;
Decornez, H ;
Furr, JR ;
Bajorath, J .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2004, 3 (11) :935-949
[19]  
Koes D. R., 2015, COMPUTER AIDED DRUG, P167
[20]   Lessons Learned in Empirical Scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 Benchmarking Exercise [J].
Koes, David Ryan ;
Baumgartner, Matthew P. ;
Camacho, Carlos J. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2013, 53 (08) :1893-1904