共 50 条
Professional Identity Formation, Professionalism, Leadership and Resilience (PILLAR) in Medical Students: Methodology and Early Results
被引:8
作者:
Ryan, Aine
[1
,5
]
Hickey, Anne
[2
]
Harkin, Denis
[1
]
Boland, Fiona
[3
]
Collins, Mary E.
[4
]
Doyle, Frank
[2
]
机构:
[1] Royal Coll Surg Ireland Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Ctr Professionalism Med & Hlth Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Royal Coll Surg Ireland Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Populat Hlth, Dept Hlth Psychol, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Royal Coll Surg Ireland Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Data Sci Ctr, Sch Populat Hlth, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Royal Coll Surg Ireland Grad Sch Healthcare Manage, Dublin, Ireland
[5] Royal Coll Surg Ireland Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Ctr Professionalism Med & Hlth Sci, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词:
medical education research;
PIF;
professionalism;
leadership;
resilience;
progress testing;
3RD YEAR;
EDUCATION;
HEALTH;
PERCEPTIONS;
PROGRAM;
SCALE;
D O I:
10.1177/23821205231198921
中图分类号:
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号:
040101 ;
120403 ;
摘要:
ObjectivesThe fundamental role of medical education is the transformation of students to doctors, through a process of education and professional identity formation (PIF), which can be informed by several educational, behavioural and emotional factors. PIF has been deemed to be of equal importance to the acquisition of clinical knowledge and skills and includes constructs such as professionalism, leadership and resilience. We aimed to assess professional identity formation, professionalism, leadership and resilience (PILLAR) in the junior years of medical school in the 2020/2021 academic year and illustrate the potential role of quantitative assessment to demonstrate progression in these areas. In this research, we provide the methods and baseline results for the PILLAR study.MethodsWe implemented a compulsory assessment in pre-clinical years of graduate entry and direct entry medicine at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland. Validated scales were used to assess students' PILLAR. Descriptive and univariable statistical techniques were used to compare student scores between respective years.ResultsA total of 1311 students (92% response rate) provided their consent for research. For the psychometric scales, there were no evident trends among the years on these assessment measures. Results indicated significant differences in all measures, however, these did not correspond to ascending years of seniority.ConclusionThe PILLAR methodology provides important information on the challenges of quantitatively assessing medical students in the four key areas of PIF, professionalism, leadership, and resilience. Our cross-sectional results point to cohort effects, without the expected progression per year in the cross-sectional data, or suggest that the chosen quantitative measures may be problematic for these constructs in pre-clinical students. Therefore, while we believe that PILLAR has potential as a progress test for these constructs, this will only truly be elucidated by repeated measures of each cohort over time.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条