The trade war's impact on the financial market: Observations from the historical global trade war- the Smoot Hawley Tariff Act

被引:3
作者
Ang, James [1 ]
Wang, Jingfang [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Coll Business, 821 Acad Dr, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
Smoot Hawley Tariff Act; Trade war; Tariff increase; Political uncertainty; Government policy; Asset pricing; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100802
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines financial market reactions to political events that led to the passage and repeal of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act (SHTA) from the perspective of political uncertainty. The events were a series of debates and votes held by the U.S. House and Senate before the SHTA was signed into law in 1930 and repealed in 1934. These events increase political uncertainty about trade policy, thereby creating a unique setting to measure the impact of political uncertainty on financial market reactions. We find that each event resulted in an average loss of 3.6% in the U.S. aggregate stock market over a [-1, +1] three-day window. Such negative returns were observed at the firm level. Moreover, we find that firms with higher tariff protection performed signifi-cantly better than firms with lower tariff protection on nonevent dates. Furthermore, we discovered that trading volumes were significantly higher on event dates than on nonevent dates. Stock return volatility was significantly higher during the entire debating and voting period than during the 12 months preceding its inception and 6 months following the SHTA's passage into law. However, higher tariff protection was associated with lower return volatility outside the event window. Our findings show that political uncertainty events commanded the risk premium.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Beaudreau B. C, 2018, J EC FINANCE, V4, P631, DOI [10.1007/s12197-017-9418-6, DOI 10.1007/S12197-017-9418-6]
[2]  
Eckes A. E, 1998, INT TRADE J, V12, P65, DOI [10.1080/08853909808523898, DOI 10.1080/08853909808523898]
[3]   Institutional holdings and payout policy [J].
Grinstein, Y ;
Michaely, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2005, 60 (03) :1389-1426
[4]  
Irwin DA, 2011, PEDDLING PROTECTIONISM: SMOOT-HAWLEY AND THE GREAT DEPRESSION, P1
[5]   The Smoot-Hawley tariff: A quantitative assessment [J].
Irwin, DA .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1998, 80 (02) :326-334
[6]  
Jones Joseph M., 1934, Tariff Retaliation: Repercussions of the Hawley-Smoot Bill
[7]   The impacts of political uncertainty on asset prices: Evidence from the Bo scandal in China [J].
Liu, Laura Xiaolei ;
Shu, Haibing ;
Wei, K. C. John .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 125 (02) :286-310
[8]   Trade wars: Canada's reaction to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff [J].
McDonald, JA ;
OBrien, AP ;
Callahan, CM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 1997, 57 (04) :802-826
[9]   Uncertainty about Government Policy and Stock Prices [J].
Pastor, Lubos ;
Veronesi, Pietro .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2012, 67 (04) :1219-1264
[10]  
The Bureau of Census, 1949, HIST STAT US 1789 19