Reducing inequities in maternal and child health in rural Guatemala through the CBIO plus Approach of Curamericas: 9. Key stakeholder perspectives on strengthening the CBIO plus Approach

被引:10
作者
Lambden, Jason [1 ]
Martin, Shayanne [2 ]
Valdez, Mario [3 ]
Stollak, Ira [4 ]
Westgate, Carey C. [5 ]
Perry, Henry B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, McGaw Med Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Global Hlth Sci, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Curamer Guatemala, San Sebastian Coatan, Huehuetenango, Guatemala
[4] Curamericas Global, Raleigh, NC USA
[5] Community Hlth Impact Coalit, New York, NY USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Hlth Syst Program, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
Maternal health; Child health; Community health; Primary health care; Community-based primary health care; Implementation research; Census-Based; Impact-Oriented Approach; Care Groups; Community birthing centers; Guatemala; Equity; Curamericas Global; Curamericas;
D O I
10.1186/s12939-022-01761-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundCommunity-based health interventions have been an integral part of recent health gains globally. An innovative approach to delivering community health care combines the Census-Based, Impact-Oriented (CBIO) Approach with Care Groups and Community Birthing Centers called Casas Maternas Rurales. CBIO+ was adopted by Curamericas/Guatemala in its Maternal and Child Health Project, 2011-2015. Here, we describe the opinions of Project staff and local government health care workers about the strengths and challenges of CBIO+. MethodsSelf-administered questionnaires, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions were used to obtain the views of 21 staff members from Curamericas/Guatemala as well as 15 local government health workers. The evaluation focused on four primary areas: (1) advisability of integrating the CBIO+ Approach into the government's rural health system, (2) staff knowledge of the CBIO+ Approach, (3) advantages, disadvantages and challenges of the CBIO+ Approach, and (4) proposed improvements to the CBIO+ Approach. The data were coded into categories and from these categories themes were derived.ResultsThe most commonly mentioned advantage of CBIO+ was the inclusion of the community in program planning, which improved participation. Many respondents noted that the CBIO+ Approach was challenging to implement in communities with internal conflicts. Among other challenges mentioned were coordinating (both among the Project staff and with others in the communities), maintenance of a high level of community participation, and overcoming opposition of men to women's participation in Care Groups. The staff mentioned a number of possible changes, including increasing male involvement, raising salaries for community-level paid staff, providing volunteers with incentives, and improving coordination both internally and externally. There was a strong demand among the local Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare staff for the Project to continue.ConclusionThe CBIO+ Approach and its implementation by Curamericas/Guatemala was overall embraced by local staff. By eliciting feedback while the project was ongoing, actionable areas for improvement were identified.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Ballard M., 2018, Updated Program Functionality Matrix for Optimizing Community Health Programs: Community Health Worker Assessment and Improvement Matrix
  • [2] Beracochea E, 2007, CURAMERICAS GUATEMAL
  • [3] Reducing inequities in maternal and child health in rural Guatemala through the CBIO plus Approach of Curamericas: 3. Expansion of population coverage of key interventions
    Blanco, Stanley
    Valdez, Mario
    Stollak, Ira
    Westgate, Carey C. C.
    Herrera, Andrew
    Perry, Henry B. B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2023, 21 (SUPPL 2)
  • [4] Global implementation survey of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI): 20 years on
    Boschi-Pinto, Cynthia
    Labadie, Guilhem
    Dilip, Thandassery Ramachandran
    Oliphant, Nicholas
    Dalglish, Sarah L.
    Aboubaker, Samira
    Agbodjan-Prince, Olga Adjoa
    Desta, Teshome
    Habimana, Phanuel
    Butron-Riveros, Betzabe
    Al-Raiby, Jamela
    Siddeeg, Khalid
    Kuttumuratova, Aigul
    Weber, Martin
    Mehta, Rajesh
    Raina, Neena
    Daelmans, Bernadette
    Diaz, Theresa
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [5] Call C., 2020, TOO MUCH SUCCESS LEG, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3526865, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3526865]
  • [6] Reducing inequities in maternal and child health in rural Guatemala through the CBIO plus Approach of Curamericas: 7. The empowering effect of Care Groups
    Gregg, Corey
    Valdez, Mario
    Stollak, Ira
    Martin, Shayanne
    Story, William T.
    Perry, Henry B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2023, 21 (SUPPL 2)
  • [7] QUALITATIVE RESEARCH - INTRODUCING FOCUS GROUPS
    KITZINGER, J
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7000) : 299 - 302
  • [8] Lambden J., 2014, LINKING CENSUS BASED
  • [9] Laughlin M., 2004, CARE GROUP DIFFERENC
  • [10] MCSP, 2017, GUAT COUNTR PROGR SU