Predicting the risk of mortality and rehospitalization in heart failure patients: A retrospective cohort study by machine learning approach

被引:3
作者
Ketabi, Marzieh [1 ]
Andishgar, Aref [2 ]
Fereidouni, Zhila [3 ]
Sani, Maryam Mojarrad [4 ]
Abdollahi, Ashkan [5 ]
Vali, Mohebat [6 ]
Alkamel, Abdulhakim [7 ]
Tabrizi, Reza [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Fasa Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Fasa, Iran
[2] Fasa Univ Med Sci, USERN Off, Fasa, Iran
[3] Fasa Univ Med Sci, Dept Med Surg Nursing, Fasa, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[5] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Shiraz, Iran
[6] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Shiraz, Iran
[7] Fasa Univ Med Sci, Noncommunicable Dis Res Ctr, Fasa, Iran
[8] Fasa Univ Med Sci, Clin Res Dev Unit, Fasa, Iran
关键词
cohort studies; heart failure; machine learning; mortality; patient readmission; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; DISEASE; ANEMIA; ETIOLOGIES; BURDEN; TRENDS; MILD;
D O I
10.1002/clc.24239
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundHeart failure (HF) is a global problem, affecting more than 26 million people worldwide. This study evaluated the performance of 10 machine learning (ML) algorithms and chose the best algorithm to predict mortality and readmission of HF patients by using The Fasa Registry on Systolic HF (FaRSH) database.HypothesisML algorithms may better identify patients at increased risk of HF readmission or death with demographic and clinical data.MethodsThrough comprehensive evaluation, the best-performing model was used for prediction. Finally, all the trained models were applied to the test data, which included 20% of the total data. For the final evaluation and comparison of the models, five metrics were used: accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity and Area Under Curve (AUC).ResultsTen ML algorithms were evaluated. The CatBoost (CAT) algorithm uses a series of decision tree models to create a nonlinear model, and this CAT algorithm performed the best of the 10 models studied. According to the three final outcomes from this study, which involved 2488 participants, 366 (14.7%) of the patients were readmitted to the hospital, 97 (3.9%) of the patients died within 1 month of the follow-up, and 342 (13.7%) of the patients died within 1 year of the follow-up. The most significant variables to predict the events were length of stay in the hospital, hemoglobin level, and family history of MI.ConclusionsThe ML-based risk stratification tool was able to assess the risk of 5-year all-cause mortality and readmission in patients with HF. ML could provide an explicit explanation of individualized risk prediction and give physicians an intuitive understanding of the influence of critical features in the model. We evaluated ten ML algorithm to predict mortality and readmission of HF patients by using (FaRSH) database. For the final evaluation and comparison of the models, five metrics were used: accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity and Area Under Curve(AUC). Finally Tthe CatBoost algorithm performed the best. The most significant variables to predict the events were length of stay in the hospital, hemoglobin level and family history of MI. image Length of stay in the hospital was the most important predictor of hospital readmission. Hemoglobin level was the most critical predictor of 1-month mortality. Family history of Mi was the most important predictor of 1-year mortality. Catboost algorithm performed the best of the ten models studied.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Survival analysis of heart failure patients: A case study [J].
Ahmad, Tanvir ;
Munir, Assia ;
Bhatti, Sajjad Haider ;
Aftab, Muhammad ;
Raza, Muhammad Ali .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07)
[2]   Machine Learning Prediction of Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [J].
Angraal, Suveen ;
Mortazavi, Bobak J. ;
Gupta, Aakriti ;
Khera, Rohan ;
Ahmad, Tariq ;
Desai, Nihar R. ;
Jacoby, Daniel L. ;
Masoudi, Frederick A. ;
Spertus, John A. ;
Krumholz, Harlan M. .
JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 8 (01) :12-21
[3]   Etiologies, Trends, and Predictors of 30-Day Readmissions in Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure [J].
Arora, Shilpkumar ;
Lahewala, Sopan ;
Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan ;
Setareh-Shenas, Saman ;
Patel, Prashant ;
Kumar, Varun ;
Tripathi, Byomesh ;
Shah, Harshil ;
Patel, Viralkumar ;
Gidwani, Umesh ;
Deshmukh, Abhishek ;
Badheka, Apurva ;
Gopalan, Radha .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 120 (04) :616-624
[4]   Machine learning-based prediction of heart failure readmission or death: implications of choosing the right model and the right metrics [J].
Awan, Saqib Ejaz ;
Bennamoun, Mohammed ;
Sohel, Ferdous ;
Sanfilippo, Frank Mario ;
Dwivedi, Girish .
ESC HEART FAILURE, 2019, 6 (02) :428-435
[6]   MODL:: A Bayes optimal discretization method for continuous attributes [J].
Boulle, Marc .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2006, 65 (01) :131-165
[7]   A multivariate model for predicting mortality in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction [J].
Brophy, JM ;
Dagenais, GR ;
McSherry, F ;
Williford, W ;
Yusuf, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 116 (05) :300-304
[8]   Hospital Length of Stay and Readmission: An Early Investigation [J].
Carey, Kathleen ;
Lin, Meng-Yun .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2014, 71 (01) :99-111
[9]   Burden and Timing of Hospitalizations in Heart Failure: A Community Study [J].
Chamberlain, Alanna M. ;
Dunlay, Shannon M. ;
Gerber, Yariv ;
Manemann, Sheila M. ;
Jiang, Ruoxiang ;
Weston, Susan A. ;
Roger, Veronique L. .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2017, 92 (02) :184-192
[10]   Temporal Trends and Patterns in Mortality After Incident Heart Failure: A Longitudinal Analysis of 86000 Individuals [J].
Conrad, Nathalie ;
Judge, Andrew ;
Canoy, Dexter ;
Tran, Jenny ;
Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina ;
Millett, Elizabeth R. C. ;
Salimi-Khorshidi, Gholamreza ;
Cleland, John G. ;
McMurray, John J., V ;
Rahimi, Kazem .
JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 4 (11) :1102-1111