The Making of #CovidTwitter: Who Were the Loudest "Covid Influencers" and What Did They Say About the COVID-19 Pandemic?

被引:1
作者
Jaworska, Sylvia [1 ,4 ]
Goodman, Michael K. [2 ]
Gibas, Iwona [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept English Language & Appl Linguist, Language & Profess Commun, Reading, England
[2] Univ Reading, Dept Geog & Environm Sci, Geog, Reading, England
[3] Univ Reading, Dept English Language & Appl Linguist, Reading, England
[4] Univ Reading, Dept English Language & Appl Linguist, Whiteknights Campus, Reading RG6 6UR, England
来源
SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY | 2024年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
anti-care discourse; COVID-19; pandemic; crisis communication; digital influencers; Twitter; SOCIAL-MEDIA; TWITTER; TWEET; US;
D O I
10.1177/20563051231222240
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study explores COVID-19 communications disseminated by the top 100 most followed Twitter profiles-what we call the Twitter influencing elite. Focusing on a critical period from January to July 2020, we conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of 6,602 tweets about COVID-19 produced by these Covid Influencers. The findings reveal that approximately two-thirds of the COVID-19 tweets in our sample originated from established global media organizations. While these sources were prominent, they were not the "loudest" in terms of engagement and virality. That belonged to powerful politicians like Trump and Obama, popular singers such as Harry Styles and Taylor Swift, and business personalities like Elon Musk. What is more, our qualitative analysis highlights how the affordances of the digital space and the context of the pandemic were leveraged by these influential Twitter users to advance their own agendas. For instance, some blended health information and caring narratives with promotional appeals, while others, such as Elon Musk and Donald Trump, engaged in political agitation and/or anti-care discourses creating a staccato of conflicting messaging and mis/dis-information. These findings demonstrate that the Twitter space is as political and politicized as it is commercial and commercialized. We conclude that digital influencers and celebrities cannot just simply be used to produce communications during times of crisis as many across the study of health and medical communication have argued. The involvement by digital influencers and celebrities-much like the Covid Influencers we examined here-in spreading information must be critically scrutinized, considering the potential for mixed motives, agendas, and real-world outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   The Tropes of Celebrity Environmentalism [J].
Abidin, Crystal ;
Brockington, Dan ;
Goodman, Michael K. ;
Mostafanezhad, Mary ;
Richey, Lisa Ann .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 45, 2020, 45 :387-410
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Age of icons: Exploring philanthrocapitalism in the contemporary world
[3]  
Austin J. L., 1962, DO THINGS WORDS
[4]  
Bartlett J., 2014, Democracy in Britain: Essays in Honour of James Cornford, P91
[5]   "School Strike 4 Climate": Social Media and the International Youth Protest on Climate Change [J].
Boulianne, Shelley ;
Lalancette, Mireille ;
Ilkiw, David .
MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION, 2020, 8 (02) :208-218
[6]  
Boyd D, 2010, P ANN HICSS, P1657
[7]   Conspicuous redemption? Reflections on the promises and perils of the 'Celebritization' of climate change [J].
Boykoff, Maxwell T. ;
Goodman, Michael K. .
GEOFORUM, 2009, 40 (03) :395-406
[8]   Vaccine misinformation and social media [J].
Burki, Talha .
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2019, 1 (06) :E258-E259
[9]  
Calma J, 2023, VERGE
[10]   Stars-They're Sick Like Us! The Effects of a Celebrity Exemplar on COVID-19-Related Risk Cognitions, Emotions, and Preventative Behavioral Intentions [J].
Cohen, Elizabeth L. .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2020, 42 (05) :724-741