Estimating the monetary value of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in Quebec

被引:6
作者
Kouakou, Christian R. C. [1 ,2 ]
He, Jie [1 ]
Poder, Thomas G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Sch Business, Dept Econ, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[2] Inst Univ Sante Mentale Montreal, Ctr Rech, CIUSSS Est Ile Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Management Evaluat & Hlth Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
QALY; WTP; Time trade-off; Contingent valuation; Discrete choice experiment; SF-6Dv2; Quebec; D61; D81; I18; CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; HEALTH; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-023-01625-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe value of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year (QALY) is of great importance for the healthcare system. It helps when it comes to defining a cost-effectiveness threshold for the evaluation of health technologies. No willingness-to-pay value for a QALY exists in the province of Quebec, Canada.ObjectivesIn this paper, we empirically investigated the monetary value of a QALY for the population of Quebec.MethodsBased on the Short-Form 6-Dimension version 2 (SF-6Dv2), we conducted an online survey with a representative adult sample living in Quebec. We used a time trade-off (TTO) combined with contingent valuation (CV), and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess both the population's willingness to pay (WTP) for one QALY and the marginal WTP for health attributes. A health utility algorithm using hybrid regression was developed to determine a preference-based value set for health states.ResultsMain analysis was conducted on 993 answers for the CV and 2143 answers for the DCE. The willingness-to-pay per QALY varied from CA$ 47,048.84 (CI: 21,554.38; 72,543.30) for CV to CA$ 73,936.87 (CI: 63,105.40; 84,768.35) for DCE. Among the 6 dimensions of the SF-6Dv2, marginal WTP varied from CA$ 4499.15 (CI: 2975.06; 6023.25) for more role accomplishment in daily activities to CA$ 15,867.12 (CI: 13,825.75; 17,908.49) for less pain. Robustness check with multiple alternative samples, as well as alternative health utility algorithms, showed that the results were robust and the DCE method provided 50% larger results than the CV method, although confidence intervals overlap.ConclusionThis paper provides useful information for decision-makers on the monetary value of a QALY in Quebec.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 811
页数:25
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Living Concussion Guidelines
[2]   Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation [J].
Bateman, IJ ;
Langford, IH ;
Jones, AP ;
Kerr, GN .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2001, 23 (03) :191-213
[3]   The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12 [J].
Brazier, JE ;
Roberts, J .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (09) :851-859
[4]   Developing a New Version of the SF-6D Health State Classification System From the SF-36v2: SF-6Dv2 [J].
Brazier, John E. ;
Mulhern, Brendan J. ;
Bjorner, Jakob B. ;
Gandek, Barbara ;
Rowen, Donna ;
Alonso, Jordi ;
Vilagut, Gemma ;
Ware, John E. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2020, 58 (06) :557-565
[5]  
CADTH, 2017, CAN AG DRUGS TECHN H
[6]  
Fauteux V., 2017, Int J Health Pref Res, V1, P2, DOI DOI 10.21965/IJHPR.2017.001
[7]   Health utility measures and the standard gamble [J].
Garza, AG ;
Wyrwich, KW .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (04) :360-363
[8]   Willingness to pay for a QALY [J].
Gyrd-Hansen, D .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 12 (12) :1049-1060
[9]  
HAS, 2011, CHOIX METH EV EC HAS
[10]   Willingness to pay for QALY: perspectives and contexts in Japan [J].
Igarashi, Ataru ;
Goto, Rei ;
Yoneyama-Hirozane, Mariko .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 22 (10) :1041-1046