Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards- Value of Information (CHEERS-VOI): Explanation and Elaboration

被引:16
作者
Kunst, Natalia [1 ,2 ,12 ]
Siu, Annisa [3 ]
Drummond, Michael [1 ]
Grimm, Sabine E. [4 ]
Grutters, Janneke [5 ]
Husereau, Don [6 ,7 ]
Koffijberg, Hendrik [8 ]
Rothery, Claire [1 ]
Wilson, Edward C. F. [9 ]
Heath, Anna [3 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York, England
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Hosp Sick Children, Child Hlth Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Hlth Econ & Technol Assessment Maastric, Dept Epidemiol & Med Technol Assessment KEMTA, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Evidence, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[7] Inst Hlth Econ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[8] Univ Twente, Techmed Ctr, Dept Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Enschede, Netherlands
[9] Univ Exeter, Peninsula Technol Assessment Grp, Exeter, England
[10] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London, England
[12] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, Heslington YO10 5DD, Yorks, England
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
CHEERS checklist; health economic evaluation; reporting guideline; value of information; PROBABILISTIC SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; EXPECTED VALUE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SAMPLE INFORMATION; PERFECT INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY; CARE; MODELS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Although the ISPOR Value of Information (VOI) Task Force's reports outline VOI concepts and provide good practice recommendations, there is no guidance for reporting VOI analyses. VOI analyses are usually performed alongside economic evaluations for which the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Statement provides reporting guidelines. Thus, we developed the CHEERS-VOI checklist to provide reporting guidance and checklist to support the transparent, reproducible, and high-quality reporting of VOI analyses. Methods: A comprehensive literature review generated a list of 26 candidate reporting items. These candidate items underwent a Delphi procedure with Delphi participants through 3 survey rounds. Participants rated each item on a 9-point Likert scale to indicate its relevance when reporting the minimal, essential information about VOI methods and provided comments. The Delphi results were reviewed at 2-day consensus meetings and the checklist was finalized using anonymous voting. Results: We had 30, 25, and 24 Delphi respondents in rounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. After incorporating revisions recommended by the Delphi participants, all 26 candidate items proceeded to the 2-day consensus meetings. The final CHEERS-VOI checklist includes all CHEERS items, but 7 items require elaboration when reporting VOI. Further, 6 new items were added to report information relevant only to VOI (eg, VOI methods applied). Conclusions: The CHEERS-VOI checklist should be used when a VOI analysis is performed alongside economic evaluations. The CHEERS-VOI checklist will help decision makers, analysts and peer reviewers in the assessment and interpretation of VOI analyses and thereby increase transparency and rigor in decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1473
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Evidence synthesis, parameter correlation and probabilistic sensitivity analysis
    Ades, AE
    Claxton, K
    Sculpher, M
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 15 (04) : 373 - 381
  • [2] Expected value of sample information calculations in medical decision modeling
    Ades, AE
    Lu, G
    Claxton, K
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2004, 24 (02) : 207 - 227
  • [3] An Introductory Tutorial on Cohort State-Transition Models in R Using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example
    Alarid-Escudero, Fernando
    Krijkamp, Eline
    Enns, Eva A.
    Yang, Alan
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    Pechlivanoglou, Petros
    Jalal, Hawre
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2023, 43 (01) : 3 - 20
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
  • [5] Baio G, 2017, Bayesian Cost-Effectiveness Analysis With the R Package BCEA
  • [6] Baio G., 2013, Bayesian methods in health economics
  • [7] UNCERTAINTY IN THE ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF HEALTH-CARE TECHNOLOGIES - THE ROLE OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
    BRIGGS, A
    SCULPHER, M
    BUXTON, M
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1994, 3 (02) : 95 - 104
  • [8] Briggs A, 2006, Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation
  • [9] Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6
    Briggs, Andrew H.
    Weinstein, Milton C.
    Fenwick, Elisabeth A. L.
    Karnon, Jonathan
    Sculpher, Mark J.
    Paltiel, A. David
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (06) : 835 - 842
  • [10] Modeling Good Research Practices-Overview: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1
    Caro, J. Jaime
    Briggs, Andrew H.
    Siebert, Uwe
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (05) : 667 - 677