Middle powers as 'peacemaking entrepreneurs' in Myanmar's peace process 2011-2021

被引:0
作者
Roy, Chiraag [1 ]
Ware, Anthony [1 ]
Laoutides, Costas [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch humanities & Social Sci, Burwood, Vic, Australia
关键词
Entrepreneurial states; international relations theory; middle powers; Myanmar; peace processes; AUSTRALIA; INDONESIA; DIPLOMACY; POLITICS; STATES; IDEAS;
D O I
10.1080/09512748.2023.2264520
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Middle powers were visible actors in Myanmar's peace-donor landscape, from the beginning of that country's peace process in 2011 until the 2021 coup. Considering Myanmar's longstanding dependency on China and generally difficult relationship with larger powers, this appears to be significant. However, the literature on middle powers remains incapacitated by a definitional opacity that makes application of the term difficult, despite consistent references to their mediating capabilities. Recent scholarship has applied an 'entrepreneurial' lens to understanding middle power behaviour, implying middle powers are driven by a confluence of material and ideational factors. Based on fieldwork interviews with over fifty informants examining Norwegian, Japanese and Australian engagement with peacemaking in Myanmar 2011-2021, this paper expands on the entrepreneurial label and argues that middle powers in Myanmar acted as peacemaking entrepreneurs-as actors that traded upon their peacemaking reputations to secure concomitant material benefits. Nevertheless, this paper argues that engaging in peacemaking entrepreneurship proved to be problematic in Myanmar's context, given it tended to favour incumbent power. Indeed, in stark contrast to theoretical assumptions of these actors as neutral intermediaries, this paper raises serious questions about the contribution of middle powers in peacemaking.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 912
页数:29
相关论文
共 84 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Critique of Japan International Cooperation Agencys Blueprint for Development in Southeastern Burma/Myanmar
[3]  
Bandarage A., 2011, The Brown Journal of World Affairs, V17, P221
[4]   The changing architecture of politics in the Asia-Pacific: Australia's middle power moment? [J].
Beeson, Mark ;
Higgott, Richard .
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC, 2014, 14 (02) :215-237
[5]  
Behringer RonaldM., 2005, COOP CONFL, V40, P305, DOI DOI 10.1177/0010836705055068
[6]   Ideas and Norms in Swedish Peace Policy [J].
Bjorkdahl, Annika .
SWISS POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2013, 19 (03) :322-337
[7]   Bridging between Myanmar and international society - Japan's self-identity and kakehashi policy [J].
Black, Lindsay .
PACIFIC REVIEW, 2013, 26 (04) :337-359
[8]  
Botero Giovanni., 1635, CAUSE GREATNESSE CIT
[9]  
Boutros-Ghali Boutros., 1992, Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to the Statement adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January,1992
[10]  
Brooks B., 2003, MENCIUS CONTEXTS INT, P242