Ethnobiology, the Ontological Turn, and Human Sociality

被引:1
作者
Wilson, Robert A. [1 ]
Neco, Lucia C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Humanities, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
ethnobiology; ontological turn; integration; human sociality; kinship; ANTHROPOLOGY; POLITICS; KINSHIP;
D O I
10.1177/02780771231194781
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
The ontological turn (OT) is a loose cluster of theoretical approaches within cultural anthropology that advocates a synthetic, overarching way forward for ethnographically oriented cultural anthropology. We argue that in order to contribute substantively to ethnobiology the OT needs to distance itself from a long-standing tradition of thinking within ethnography that assumes some kind of fundamental divide between the natural and the social sciences. This distancing seems especially unlikely in light of the meta-anthropological nature of the OT as primarily a perspective on ethnographic methodology. Instead, we advocate for naturalistic theoretical alternatives for thinking about human sociality, where philosophical innovation develops in concert with ongoing empirical work across the biological, cognitive, and social sciences. We illustrate this perspective by drawing on two naturalistic accounts likely to prove more fruitful for ethnobiological practice, namely, trans-genera models of sociality and progenerative views of kinship.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 207
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   World Heritage and the Ontological Turn: New Materialities and the Enactment of Collective Pasts INTRODUCTION [J].
Hill, Matthew J. .
ANTHROPOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2018, 91 (04) :1179-1202
[22]   On lustful deities and the ontological turn in the archaeology of ancient Egypt [J].
Matic, Uros .
ARS & HUMANITAS: JOURNAL OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES, 2023, 17 (02) :143-166
[23]   Beyond the Ontological Turn: Affirming the Relative Autonomy of Politics [J].
Khan, Gulshan .
POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2017, 15 (04) :551-563
[24]   Ways to Be Understood: The Ontological Turn and Interpretive Social Science [J].
Sivado, Akos .
PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2020, 50 (06) :565-585
[25]   The Shape of Things to Come? Reflections on the Ontological Turn in Anthropology [J].
Sivado, Akos .
PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2015, 45 (01) :83-99
[26]   The ontological turn revisited: Theoretical decline. Why cannot ontologists fulfil their promise? [J].
Palecek, Martin .
ANTHROPOLOGICAL THEORY, 2022, 22 (02) :154-175
[27]   The Materialities of Place Making in the Ancient Andes: a Critical Appraisal of the Ontological Turn in Archaeological Interpretation [J].
Swenson, Edward .
JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHOD AND THEORY, 2015, 22 (03) :677-712
[29]   TOWARDS AN ANTHROPOLOGY WITH FLOW: STEPS TO GO BEYOND THE 'ONTOLOGICAL TURN' [J].
Rojas-Bahamonde, Pablo ;
Blanco-Wells, Gustavo ;
Amalia Mellado, Maria .
VISUAL ETHNOGRAPHY, 2020, 9 (01) :19-37
[30]   The limits of culture in political theory: A critique of multiculturalism from the perspective of anthropology's ontological turn [J].
Turner, Ben .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY, 2021, 20 (02) :252-271