Is it possible to predict the success of single dose methotrexate in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancies?

被引:3
作者
Pek, Eren [1 ]
Beyazit, Fatma [1 ]
Siddikoglu, Duygu [2 ]
机构
[1] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Canakkale, Turkiye
[2] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, Canakkale, Turkiye
关键词
ectopic pregnancy; endometrial thickness; prognostic endometrial knownledge; human chorionic gonado- tropin-[3; single-dose methotrexate; neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; platelet-lymphocyte ratio; SERUM BETA-HCG; ENDOMETRIAL THICKNESS; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; RECEPTORS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.5603/GP.a2023.0004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: In this study, the aim was to determine whether the use of endometrial thickness or neutrophil/lymphocyte and platelet/lymphocyte ratio would be useful in predicting the success of methotrexate in the treatment of ectopic pregnancies located in the fallopian tubes.Materal and methods:This study was carried out by retrospectively examining 68 study group cases with an ultrasono-graphically detectable gestational sac in the fallopian tubes and 189 control group cases with an unruptured ectopic pregnancy diagnosis at any location. The cut-off value of endometrial thickness was calculated as a new marker between the cases in which single-dose methotrexate treatment was successful and the cases with treatment failure. Treatment success was evaluated with different models including endometrial thickness, fetal cardiac activity status, measurable crown-rump length, and [3-hCG.Result: The cut-off value of [3-hCG for treatment success was determined as 2960.5 ng/mL, and the cut-off value for endometrial thickness was determined as 10.5 mm. Although NLR seems to be a marker with a cut-off value of 2.49, it does not provide an extra benefit in combined use as it is not a specific predictor. The highest success in predicting treat-ment success was achieved in the modeling in which crown-rump length + fetal cardiac activity + [3-hCG + endometrial thickness were used together.Conclusions: The use of endometrial thickness as a marker seems to be quite reliable in predicting treatment success. And we think it would be beneficial to thin the endometrium before using methotrexate.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 257
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Can hematologic parameters predict treatment of ectopic pregnancy? [J].
Akkaya, Hatice ;
Uysal, Gulsum .
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 33 (04) :937-942
[2]   Two-dose versus single-dose methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis [J].
Alur-Gupta, Snigdha ;
Cooney, Laura G. ;
Senapati, Suneeta ;
Sammel, Mary D. ;
Barnhart, Kurt T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (02) :95-+
[3]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2008, Obstet Gynecol, V111, P1479, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817d201e
[4]   Ectopic Pregnancy [J].
Barnhart, Kurt T. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (04) :379-387
[5]   Methotrexate for ectopic pregnancy: when and how [J].
Cecchino, Gustavo Nardini ;
Araujo Junior, Edward ;
Elito Junior, Julio .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 290 (03) :417-423
[6]  
Darkhaneh RF, 2015, INT J REPROD BIOMED, V13, P101
[7]   CHANGES IN CONCENTRATION OF UTERINE CYTOPLASMIC ESTROGEN RECEPTORS INDUCED BY DOXORUBICIN AND METHOTREXATE [J].
DICARLO, F ;
CONTI, G ;
GENAZZANI, E ;
REBOANI, C .
JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1978, 79 (02) :201-208
[8]   Endometrial Thickness and Serum beta-hCG as Predictors of the Effectiveness of Oral Misoprostol in Early Pregnancy Failure [J].
El-Baradie, Sahar M. Y. ;
El-Said, Manal H. ;
Ragab, Wael S. ;
Elssery, Khaled M. ;
Mahmoud, Manal .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2008, 30 (10) :877-881
[9]   Effect of methotrexate on embryonal implantation: an experimental rat model [J].
Erdil, Gokhan ;
Ercin, M. Emre ;
Guven, Suleyman .
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 36 (11) :978-981
[10]   Ectopic pregnancy not within the (distal) fallopian tube: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment [J].
Fylstra, Donald L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (04) :289-299