Hazelnut abscission is delayed by simulated drift of 2,4-D

被引:1
|
作者
Moretti, Marcelo L. L. [1 ]
de Souza, Larissa Larroca [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Hort, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Hort, Corvallis, OR USA
关键词
Auxin; crop injury; tree nuts; VITIS-VINIFERA RESPONSE; PREHARVEST DROP; DICAMBA; YIELD; HERBICIDES; EXPOSURE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1017/wsc.2023.43
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The herbicide 2,4-D is commonly used for sucker control in hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). However, the use of 2,4-D for sucker control has been implicated in delaying natural abscission in hazelnut. Hazelnuts naturally abscise and are collected from the orchard floor. Delays in abscission may reduce nut quality due to the onset of the rainy season, increasing mold and mud in the nuts. The effect of basal-directed applications of 2,4-D on hazelnut abscission, yield, and quality was assessed. In the first study, four basal-directed applications of 2,4-D (1.06 kg ae ha(-1)) did not affect hazelnut abscission, yield, or quality compared with glufosinate (1.1 kg ai ha(-1)) or manual pruning. In a second 3-yr study, a single yearly simulated drift of 2,4-D to the tree canopy at 0.06 and 0.6 mg L-1 increased the growing degree-day requirement from 50 to 141 to reach 50% hazelnut abscission, compared with the nontreated control. This is the equivalent of 5 to 15 calendar days. No effect was observed in the third year of the study when the simulated drift was not performed. No differences in abscission were observed with basal-directed applications of 2,4-D at rates up to 4.4 kg ha(-1) when applied four times each season during all 3 yr of the study. Simulated drift reduced hazelnut yield by up to 37% and reduced the percentage of marketable nuts during 1 yr of the study. No effect on average kernel weight was observed. However, 2,4-D drift did delay hazelnut abscission, highlighting the importance of drift control measures.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 513
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Simulated 2,4-D and Dicamba Drift
    Everitt, John D.
    Keeling, J. Wayne
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 23 (04) : 503 - 506
  • [2] Response of Wine Grape Cultivars to Simulated Drift Rates of 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Glyphosate, and 2,4-D or Dicamba Plus Glyphosate
    Mohseni-Moghadam, Mohsen
    Wolfe, Scott
    Dami, Imed
    Doohan, Douglas
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 30 (03) : 807 - 814
  • [3] Response of Bell Pepper and Broccoli to Simulated Drift Rates of 2,4-D and Dicamba
    Mohseni-Moghadam, Mohsen
    Doohan, Douglas
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (02) : 226 - 232
  • [4] Simulated Single Drift Events of 2,4-D and Dicamba on Pecan Trees
    Wells, M. Lenny
    Prostko, Eric P.
    Carter, O. Wendell
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 360 - 366
  • [5] Soybean injury caused by the application of subdoses of 2,4-D or dicamba, in simulated drift
    Nunes, Rodrigo T.
    Albrecht, Alfredo Junior P.
    Albrecht, Leandro P.
    Lorenzetti, Juliano B.
    Danilussi, Maikon Tiago Y.
    da Silva, Roniereson Mateus H.
    Silva, Andre Felipe M.
    Barroso, Arthur A. M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD CONTAMINANTS AND AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 2023, 58 (04) : 327 - 333
  • [6] SIMULATED DRIFT OF DICAMBA AND 2,4-D ON SOYBEANS: EFFECTS OF APPLICATION DOSE AND TIME
    Costa, Estevam Matheus
    Jakelaitis, Adriano
    Zuchi, Jacson
    Pereira, Leandro Spindola
    Abadia Ventura, Matheus Vinicius
    de Oliveira, Gustavo Silva
    de Sousa, Gustavo Dorneles
    Silva, Jeovane Nascimento
    BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2020, 36 (03): : 857 - 864
  • [7] A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of 2,4-D and Dicamba Drift on Soybean and Cotton
    Egan, J. Franklin
    Barlow, Kathryn M.
    Mortensen, David A.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2014, 62 (01) : 193 - 206
  • [8] The effect of cotton growth stage on response to a sublethal concentration of 2,4-D
    Buol, John T.
    Reynolds, Daniel B.
    Dodds, Darrin M.
    Mills, J. Anthony
    Nichols, Robert L.
    Bond, Jason A.
    Jenkins, Johnie N.
    DuBien, Janice L.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (02) : 321 - 328
  • [9] The Response of Iranian Melon (Cucumis melo L.) Accessions to 2,4-D Drift
    Zangoueinejad, Rouzbeh
    Sirooeinejad, Behnaz
    Alebrahim, Mohammad Taghi
    Bajwa, Ali Ahsan
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (11):
  • [10] Cotton Stage of Growth Determines Sensitivity to 2,4-D
    Byrd, Seth A.
    Collins, Guy D.
    Culpepper, A. Stanley
    Dodds, Darrin M.
    Edmisten, Keith L.
    Wright, David L.
    Morgan, Gaylon D.
    Baumann, Paul A.
    Dotray, Peter A.
    Manuchehri, Misha R.
    Jones, Andrea
    Grey, Timothy L.
    Webster, Theodore M.
    Davis, Jerry W.
    Whitaker, Jared R.
    Roberts, Phillip M.
    Snider, John L.
    Porter, Wesley M.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 30 (03) : 601 - 610