Critical decisions: A mixed-methods study of decision-making among diverse gynecologic cancer patients considering therapeutic clinical trial enrollment

被引:0
|
作者
Rieder, Stephanie Margrit [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Burgess, Ellen
Rutledge, Teresa [1 ]
Sussman, Andrew [2 ]
Boyce, Tawny
Pankratz, Vernon Shane
Kano, Miria [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Canc Control & Populat Sci, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Albuquerque, NM USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Dept Family & Community Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[4] Univ New Mexico, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[5] 2325 Camino Salud NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Gynecologic cancers; Health disparities; Clinical trials; Qualitative research; Intersectionality; Precarity; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; PARTICIPATION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.031
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Participation in therapeutic clinical trials does not reflect the diversity of gynecologic cancer patients, limiting access to novel therapeutics and generalizability of results. Reasons for inequities in participation among historically underrepresented populations remain undertheorized, as studies have shown equal willingness to participate among groups. We sought to apply a precarity framework to conceptualize the factors that impact patients' desire to enroll, to improve equity in gynecologic oncology clinical trial participation. Methods. Gynecologic cancer patients at a single tertiary care facility in the Southwestern United States who discussed participation in therapeutic clinical trial with their oncology provider from 2020 to 2021 were identified. Enrolled participants completed surveys and qualitative interviews regarding treatment experiences and decision -making. Oncology providers completed parallel surveys at the time of their patient's enrollment. Descriptive statistics and thematic coding were used to analyze data. Results. 30 patients were enrolled and participated in surveys and interviews. No differences were found in quantitative data assessing shared decision -making and patient -centered communication between those who enrolled and those who did not. Qualitative data demonstrated that patients who declined trial enrollment expressed concerns regarding uncertainty and loss of control, independence in decision -making, and significant resource challenges and financial toxicity of cancer treatment. Conclusions. We identified a constellation of factors that contribute to desire to enroll in clinical trials, that we describe using the framework of precarity. Through identification of precarious patients and mitigation of burdens, we anticipate improved enrollment and retention in therapeutic clinical trials among diverse gynecologic oncology patients. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] Exploring the Nurses' Perspective on Using Remote Electronic Symptom Monitoring in Clinical Decision-Making Among Patients With Metastatic Lung Cancer
    Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen
    Friis, Rasmus Blechingberg
    Grytnes, Regine
    Grove, Birgith Engelst
    Hjollund, Niels Henrik
    Pappot, Helle
    Skuladottir, Halla
    Mejdahl, Caroline Trillingsgaard
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 39 (06)
  • [32] Barriers of and strategies for shared decision-making implementation in the care of metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals in an Asian country
    Lee, Ping Yein
    Cheong, Ai Theng
    Ghazali, Sazlina Shariff
    Rashid, Aneesa Abdul
    Ong, Siu Ching
    Ong, Soo Ying
    Alip, Adlinda
    Sylvia, McCarthy
    Chen, May Feng
    Taib, Nur Aishah
    Jaganathan, Maheswari
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    Teo, Soo-Hwang
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (06) : 2837 - 2850
  • [33] Views of general practice staff about the use of a patient-oriented treatment decision aid in shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: A mixed-methods study
    Wildeboer, Anita
    du Pon, Esther
    Schuling, Jan
    Haaijer-Ruskamp, Flora M.
    Denig, Petra
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (01) : 64 - 74
  • [34] Randomized trial of community health worker-led decision coaching to promote shared decision-making for prostate cancer screening among Black male patients and their providers
    Makarov, Danil V.
    Feuer, Zachary
    Ciprut, Shannon
    Lopez, Natalia Martinez
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Shedlin, Michele
    Gold, Heather T.
    Li, Huilin
    Lynch, Gina
    Warren, Rueben
    Ubel, Peter
    Ravenell, Joseph E.
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [35] The Health Equity Through Aging Research And Discussion (HEARD) Study: A Proposed Two-Phase Sequential Mixed-Methods Research Design To Understand Barriers And Facilitators Of Brain Donation Among Diverse Older Adults Brain donation decision making among diverse older adults.
    Glover, Crystal M.
    Shah, Raj C.
    Bennett, David A.
    Wilson, Robert S.
    Barnes, Lisa L.
    EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (04) : 311 - 322
  • [36] "Ultimately, mom has the call": Viewing clinical trial decision making among patients with ovarian cancer through the lens of relational autonomy
    Asiedu, Gladys B.
    Ridgeway, Jennifer L.
    Carroll, Katherine
    Jatoi, Aminah
    Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (06) : 981 - 989
  • [37] The SAKK cancer-specific geriatric assessment (C-SGA): a pilot study of a brief tool for clinical decision-making in older cancer patients
    Clough-Gorr, Kerri M.
    Noti, Lea
    Brauchli, Peter
    Cathomas, Richard
    Fried, Marius R.
    Roberts, Gillian
    Stuck, Andreas E.
    Hitz, Felicitas
    Mey, Ulrich
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
  • [38] Use of decision aid to improve informed decision-making and communication with physicians on the use of oral complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among cancer patients on chemotherapy treatment: a randomised controlled trial
    Chong, Wan-Qin
    Mogro, Maria Jannet
    Arsad, Asrie
    Tai, Bee-Choo
    Lee, Soo-Chin
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (07) : 3689 - 3696
  • [39] Patients' perceived involvement in clinical decision-making and associated factors among adult patients admitted at Jimma Medical Center, Oromia, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
    Dibera, Keneni Dina
    Debancho, Wadu Wolancho
    Bedada, Gadisa Bekele
    Dugasa, Yonas Gurmu
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [40] Effectiveness and implementation of SHared decision-making supported by OUTcome information among patients with breast cancer, stroke and advanced kidney disease: SHOUT study protocol of multiple interrupted time series
    Hackert, Mariska Quirina Nikita
    Ankersmid, Jet W.
    Engels, Noel
    Prick, Janine C. M.
    Teerenstra, Steven
    Siesling, Sabine
    Drossaert, Constance H. C.
    Strobbe, Luc J. A.
    van Riet, Yvonne E. A.
    van den Dorpel, Rene M. A.
    Bos, Willem Jan W.
    van der Nat, Paul B.
    Van den Berg-Vos, Renske M.
    van Schaik, Sander M.
    Garvelink, Mirjam M.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):