Critical decisions: A mixed-methods study of decision-making among diverse gynecologic cancer patients considering therapeutic clinical trial enrollment

被引:0
|
作者
Rieder, Stephanie Margrit [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Burgess, Ellen
Rutledge, Teresa [1 ]
Sussman, Andrew [2 ]
Boyce, Tawny
Pankratz, Vernon Shane
Kano, Miria [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Canc Control & Populat Sci, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Albuquerque, NM USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Dept Family & Community Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[4] Univ New Mexico, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[5] 2325 Camino Salud NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Gynecologic cancers; Health disparities; Clinical trials; Qualitative research; Intersectionality; Precarity; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; PARTICIPATION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.031
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Participation in therapeutic clinical trials does not reflect the diversity of gynecologic cancer patients, limiting access to novel therapeutics and generalizability of results. Reasons for inequities in participation among historically underrepresented populations remain undertheorized, as studies have shown equal willingness to participate among groups. We sought to apply a precarity framework to conceptualize the factors that impact patients' desire to enroll, to improve equity in gynecologic oncology clinical trial participation. Methods. Gynecologic cancer patients at a single tertiary care facility in the Southwestern United States who discussed participation in therapeutic clinical trial with their oncology provider from 2020 to 2021 were identified. Enrolled participants completed surveys and qualitative interviews regarding treatment experiences and decision -making. Oncology providers completed parallel surveys at the time of their patient's enrollment. Descriptive statistics and thematic coding were used to analyze data. Results. 30 patients were enrolled and participated in surveys and interviews. No differences were found in quantitative data assessing shared decision -making and patient -centered communication between those who enrolled and those who did not. Qualitative data demonstrated that patients who declined trial enrollment expressed concerns regarding uncertainty and loss of control, independence in decision -making, and significant resource challenges and financial toxicity of cancer treatment. Conclusions. We identified a constellation of factors that contribute to desire to enroll in clinical trials, that we describe using the framework of precarity. Through identification of precarious patients and mitigation of burdens, we anticipate improved enrollment and retention in therapeutic clinical trials among diverse gynecologic oncology patients. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] Ethical and Psychosocial Factors in the Decision-Making and Informed Consent Process for Upper Extremity Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Gordon, Elisa J.
    Gacki-Smith, Jessica
    Kuramitsu, Brianna R.
    Downey, Max
    Vanterpool, Karen B.
    Nordstrom, Michelle J.
    Riggleman, Tiffany
    Cooney, Carisa M.
    Jensen, Sally
    Dumanian, Gregory
    Tintle, Scott
    Levan, Macey
    Brandacher, Gerald
    TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT, 2023, 9 (08): : E1515
  • [22] Fostering shared decision-making about prostate cancer screening among African American men patients and their primary care providers: a randomized behavioral clinical trial
    Echeverri, Margarita
    Felder, Kyazia
    Anderson, David
    Apantaku, Elora
    Leung, Patrick
    Hoff, Clare
    Dennar, Princess
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [23] What matters in clinical trial decision-making: a systematic review of interviews exploring cancer patients' experiences
    Gregersen, Trine A.
    Birkelund, Regner
    Wolderslund, Maiken
    Netsey-Afedo, Mette Lowe
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    Ammentorp, Jette
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2019, 33 (02) : 266 - 278
  • [24] Exploring patients' and carers' views about the clinical use of ketamine to inform policy and practical decisions: mixed-methods study
    Jilka, Sagar
    Murray, Claire
    Wieczorek, Ania
    Griffiths, Helena
    Wykes, Til
    McShane, Rupert
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2019, 5 (04):
  • [25] Cancer Care Experiences, Resilience, and Psychological Symptoms Among Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Pozzar, Rachel A.
    Yackel, Hayley Dunnack
    Eche-Ugwu, Ijeoma Julie
    Hammer, Marilyn J.
    Cooley, Mary E.
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2025, 52 (02) : 97 - 112
  • [26] Clinical Trial Protocol for a Randomized Trial of Community Health Worker-led Decision Coaching to Promote Shared Decision-making on Prostate Cancer Screening Among Black Male Patients and Their Providers
    V. Makarov, Danil
    Ciprut, Shannon
    Martinez-Lopez, Natalia
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Thomas, Jerry
    Shedlin, Michele
    Gold, Heather T.
    Li, Huilin
    Bhat, Sandeep
    Warren, Rueben
    Ubel, Peter
    Ravenell, Joseph E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (05): : 909 - 912
  • [27] Engaging adolescents and young adults in decisions about return of genomic research results: study protocol for a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol
    Blumling, Amy A.
    Mcgowan, Michelle L.
    Prows, Cynthia A.
    Childers-Buschle, Kristin
    Martin, Lisa J.
    Lynch, John A.
    Dufendach, Kevin R.
    Lipstein, Ellen A.
    Kovacic, Melinda Butsch
    Brinkman, William B.
    Myers, Melanie F.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [28] Revision of the Advanced Cancer Patients' Distress Scale (ACPDS): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in Germany
    Zueger, Andrea
    Fischbeck, Sabine
    Weber, Martin
    Mai, Sandra
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [29] Engaging and supporting women with chronic kidney disease with pre-conception decision-making (including their experiences during COVID 19): A mixed-methods study protocol
    Phillips, Rhiannon
    McLaughlin, Leah
    Williams, Denitza
    Williams, Helen
    Noyes, Jane
    Jones, Caron
    Oleary, Catherine
    Mallett, Carmen
    Griffin, Sian
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (06) : 2887 - 2897
  • [30] Real-time monitoring and feedback to improve shared decision-making for surgery (the ALPACA Study): protocol for a mixed-methods study to inform co-development of an inclusive intervention
    Hoffmann, Christin
    Avery, Kerry N. L.
    Macefield, Rhiannon C.
    Snelgrove, Val
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Hopkins, Della
    Hickey, Shireen
    Cabral, Christie
    Hall, Jennifer
    Gibbison, Ben
    Rooshenas, Leila
    Williams, Adam
    Aning, Jonathan
    Bekker, Hilary L.
    McNair, Angus G. K.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):