Critical decisions: A mixed-methods study of decision-making among diverse gynecologic cancer patients considering therapeutic clinical trial enrollment

被引:0
|
作者
Rieder, Stephanie Margrit [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Burgess, Ellen
Rutledge, Teresa [1 ]
Sussman, Andrew [2 ]
Boyce, Tawny
Pankratz, Vernon Shane
Kano, Miria [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Canc Control & Populat Sci, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Albuquerque, NM USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Dept Family & Community Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[4] Univ New Mexico, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[5] 2325 Camino Salud NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Gynecologic cancers; Health disparities; Clinical trials; Qualitative research; Intersectionality; Precarity; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; PARTICIPATION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.031
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Participation in therapeutic clinical trials does not reflect the diversity of gynecologic cancer patients, limiting access to novel therapeutics and generalizability of results. Reasons for inequities in participation among historically underrepresented populations remain undertheorized, as studies have shown equal willingness to participate among groups. We sought to apply a precarity framework to conceptualize the factors that impact patients' desire to enroll, to improve equity in gynecologic oncology clinical trial participation. Methods. Gynecologic cancer patients at a single tertiary care facility in the Southwestern United States who discussed participation in therapeutic clinical trial with their oncology provider from 2020 to 2021 were identified. Enrolled participants completed surveys and qualitative interviews regarding treatment experiences and decision -making. Oncology providers completed parallel surveys at the time of their patient's enrollment. Descriptive statistics and thematic coding were used to analyze data. Results. 30 patients were enrolled and participated in surveys and interviews. No differences were found in quantitative data assessing shared decision -making and patient -centered communication between those who enrolled and those who did not. Qualitative data demonstrated that patients who declined trial enrollment expressed concerns regarding uncertainty and loss of control, independence in decision -making, and significant resource challenges and financial toxicity of cancer treatment. Conclusions. We identified a constellation of factors that contribute to desire to enroll in clinical trials, that we describe using the framework of precarity. Through identification of precarious patients and mitigation of burdens, we anticipate improved enrollment and retention in therapeutic clinical trials among diverse gynecologic oncology patients. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Cancer treatment decision-making among parents of paediatric oncology patients in Guatemala: a mixed-methods study
    Graetz, Dylan E.
    Rivas, Silvia
    Wang, Huiqi
    Vedaraju, Yuvanesh
    Ferrara, Gia
    Fuentes, Lucia
    Caceres-Serrano, Ana
    Antillon-Klussmann, Federico
    Devidas, Meenakshi
    Metzger, Monika
    Rodriguez-Galindo, Carlos
    Mack, Jennifer W.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [2] Factors influencing the implementation of shared decision-making in breast cancer care: protocol for a mixed-methods study
    Bravo, Paulina
    Dois, Angelina
    Villarroel, Luis
    Gonzalez-Agueero, Marcela
    Fernandez-Gonzalez, Loreto
    Sanchez, Cesar
    Martinez, Alejandra
    Turen, Valentina
    Quezada, Constanza
    Guasalaga, Maria Elisabeth
    Haerter, Martin
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [3] What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study
    Santema, T. B. Katrien
    Stoffer, E. Anniek
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Koelemay, Mark J. W.
    Ubbink, Dirk T.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (02):
  • [4] Patient decision-making and regret in pilonidal sinus surgery: a mixed-methods study
    Strong, Emily
    Callaghan, Tia
    Beal, Erin
    Moffatt, Christine
    Wickramasekera, Nyantara
    Brown, Steven
    Lee, Matthew J.
    Winton, Catherine
    Hind, Daniel
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (06) : 1487 - 1498
  • [5] Evaluating Adaptation of a Cancer Clinical Trial Decision Aid for Rural Cancer Patients: A Mixed-Methods Approach
    Pathak, Swati
    George, Nerissa
    Monti, Denise
    Robinson, Kathy
    Politi, Mary C.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2019, 34 (04) : 803 - 809
  • [6] Feasibility of implementing Extubation Advisor, a clinical decision support tool to improve extubation decision-making in the ICU: a mixed-methods observational study
    Sarti, Aimee J.
    Zheng, Katina
    Herry, Christophe L.
    Sutherland, Stephanie
    Scales, Nathan B.
    Watpool, Irene
    Porteous, Rebecca
    Hickey, Michael
    Anstee, Caitlin
    Fazekas, Anna
    Ramsay, Tim
    Burns, Karen E. A.
    Seely, Andrew J. E.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [7] Ability of observer and self-report measures to capture shared decision-making in clinical practice in the UK: a mixed-methods study
    Williams, Denitza
    Edwards, Adrian
    Wood, Fiona
    Lloyd, Amy
    Brain, Kate
    Thomas, Nerys
    Prichard, Alison
    Goodland, Annwen
    Sweetland, Helen
    McGarrigle, Helen
    Hill, Gwenllian
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [8] Evaluation of a shared decision-making communication skills training for physicians treating patients with asthma: a mixed methods study using simulated patients
    Mueller, Evamaria
    Diesing, Alice
    Rosahl, Anke
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Haerter, Martin
    Buchholz, Angela
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [9] Multilevel, Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Informed Decision-Making about Clinical Trial Participation among Cancer Patients
    Chalela, Patricia
    Cortez, Vivian
    Flores, Armida
    Sivak, Sandra
    Lew, Ysabel
    Munoz, Edgar
    Despres, Cliff
    Rainosek, Callie
    Gonzalez, Alyssa
    Ali, Amara
    Mesa, Ruben
    Ramirez, Amelie
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [10] A Qualitative Study of Phase III Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment Decision-Making: Perspectives from Adolescents, Young Adults, Caregivers, and Providers
    Barakat, Lamia P.
    Schwartz, Lisa A.
    Reilly, Anne
    Deatrick, Janet A.
    Balis, Frank
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2014, 3 (01) : 3 - 11