Measuring high school student engagement in science learning: an adaptation and validation study

被引:4
作者
Li, Tingting [1 ,2 ]
He, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Lina [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Counseling Educ Psychol & Special Educ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, CREATE STEM Inst, 620 Farm Lane,115 Erickson Hall, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Qingdao 58 High Sch, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Northeast Normal Univ, Northeast NormalUnivers, Changchun, Peoples R China
关键词
Student engagement; science learning; validation; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; MOTIVATED STRATEGIES; SELF-EFFICACY; ACHIEVEMENT; CLASSROOM; TEACHERS; INQUIRY; US; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1080/09500693.2023.2248668
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study validated an instrument for measuring student engagement in the context of Chinese science curriculum reforms. We adapted existing items from well-designed instruments with the context of science learning and formed the initial instrument of the Student Engagement in Science Learning (SESL) consisting of 20 items in four subscales, including cognitive, emotional, behavioural, and agentic engagement. We recruited an expert panel to provide content and face validity during the adaptation process. The final sample of 578 was collected and analysed to provide the construct validity of the SESL instrument. The results from item analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis conformed the instrument's convergent and discriminant validity. Independent t-tests of gender and district groups confirmed the concurrent validity of the instrument. The Cronbach's coefficient alpha of the four subscales and the total scale are higher than 0.70, indicating the SESL instrument has the internal consistency reliability for measuring student engagement in science learning. Researchers and practitioners would benefit from the valid and reliable SESL instrument with the four constructs to measure and improve student engagement in science learning.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 547
页数:24
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Including teachers in the social justice equation of project-based learning: A response to Lee & Grapin [J].
Adah Miller, Emily ;
Makori, Hildah ;
Akgun, Selin ;
Miller, Cory ;
Li, Tingting ;
Codere, Susan .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2022, 59 (09) :1726-1732
[2]   Toward an Integrative and Fine-Grained Insight in Motivating and Demotivating Teaching Styles: The Merits of a Circumplex Approach [J].
Aelterman, Nathalie ;
Vansteenkiste, Maarten ;
Haerens, Leen ;
Soenens, Bart ;
Fontaine, Johnny R. J. ;
Reeve, Johnmarshall .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 111 (03) :497-521
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Amos (Version 23.0) [Computer Program]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, SCI ENG PRESCHOOL EL, DOI DOI 10.17226/26215
[6]   Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument [J].
Appleton, James J. ;
Christenson, Sandra L. ;
Kim, Dongjin ;
Reschly, Amy L. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 44 (05) :427-445
[7]   Defining and Measuring Engagement and Learning in Science: Conceptual, Theoretical, Methodological, and Analytical Issues [J].
Azevedo, Roger .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 50 (01) :84-94
[8]   The teacher-child relationship and children's early school adjustment [J].
Birch, SH ;
Ladd, GW .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 35 (01) :61-79
[9]  
BRONFENBRENNER U, 1993, J PIAGET SY, P3
[10]   Exploring the effectiveness of engagement in a broad range of disciplinary practices on learning of Turkish high-school chemistry students [J].
Cetin, Pinar Seda ;
Eymur, Guluzar ;
Southerland, Sherry A. ;
Walker, Joi ;
Whittington, Kirby .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2018, 40 (05) :473-497