Case report: The gait deviation index may predict neurotherapeutic effects of FES-assisted gait training in children with cerebral palsy

BackgroundChildren with cerebral palsy (CP) show progressive loss of ambulatory function characterized by kinematic deviations at the hip, knee, and ankle. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can lead to more typical lower limb kinematics during walking by eliciting appropriately timed muscle contractions. FES-assisted walking interventions have shown mixed to positive results in improving lower limb kinematics through immediate correction of gait during the application of FES, or long-term, persisting effects of non-FES-assisted gait improvements following multi-week FES-assisted gait training, at the absence of stimulation, i.e., neurotherapeutic effects. It is unknown, however, if children with CP will demonstrate a neurotherapeutic response following FES-assisted gait training because of the CP population's heterogeneity in gait deviations and responses to FES. Identifying the neurotherapeutic responders is, therefore, important to optimize the training interventions to those that have higher probability of benefiting from the intervention.ObjectiveThe purpose of this case study was to investigate the relationship between immediate and neurotherapeutic effects of FES-assisted walking to identify responders to a FES-assisted gait training protocol.MethodsThe primary outcome was Gait Deviation Index (GDI) and secondary outcome was root mean squared error (RMSE) of the lower extremity joint angles in the sagittal plane between participants with CP and a typically developing (TD) dataset. Potential indicators were defined as immediate improvements from baseline during FES-assisted walking followed by neurotherapeutic improvements at the end of training.Case descriptionGait analysis of two adolescent female participants with spastic diplegia (Gross Motor Function Classification System level II and III) was conducted at the start and end of a 12-week FES-assisted treadmill training protocol. Participant 1 had scissoring crouch gait, while participant 2 had jump gait.OutcomesThe GDI showed both immediate (presence of FES) and neurotherapeutic (absence of FES after training period) improvements from baseline in our two participants. Joint angle RMSE showed mixed trends between immediate and neurotherapeutic changes from baseline. The GDI warrants investigation in a larger sample to determine if it can be used to identify responders to FES-assisted gait training.