Early life failure modes and downtime analysis of onshore type-III wind turbines in Turkey

被引:3
作者
Sarma, Nur [1 ,2 ]
Tuohy, Paul M. [3 ]
Ozgonenel, Okan [4 ]
Djurovic, Sinisa [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Dept Engn, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[2] Duzce Univ, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, TR-81620 Duzce, Turkiye
[3] Univ Manchester, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Manchester M13 9PL, England
[4] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, Samsun, Turkiye
关键词
Condition monitoring; Downtime; Failures; Failure mode analysis; Reliability; SCADA alarms; Wind turbine; RELIABILITY; SEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108956
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Operations and maintenance costs, and unplanned downtime accounts for a significant proportion of the total expenditure of windfarms. Therefore, reduction of these costs is essential, which requires a better understanding of the wind turbines' reliability in terms of failure rates and downtime with operational lifetime. Failure rates and downtime are generally logged using condition monitoring systems, which mainly focus on Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) alarm signals. The aim of this paper is to use SCADA alarm statistics to provide a new failure rate and downtime survey and thus to evaluate reliability performance of the major wind turbine components and subsystems. The paper focuses on a modern onshore windfarm located in Turkey with Type-III wind turbines over the course of the first two years of operations, which is the first time reliability data from Turkey has been published in literature. The presented data can help to provide a better understanding of early life operations, since all maintenance activities, as well as stoppages that caused the wind turbines not to generate electricity were considered in this paper. Furthermore, the evaluation and categorisation of the recorded SCADA alarms, their origins and whether they were associated with planned or unplanned downtime is presented. This analysis shows that early life modern wind turbines have the highest alarm rates and downtime associated with 'safety' factors, followed by the 'electrical systems', which was found to be the most critical (or unreliable) subsystem. The presented results therefore suggest that early life focus should be on the electrical systems of wind turbines for maximising their operating time and availability. Monthly distributions of both SCADA alarms and downtime rates are also presented to highlight the effects of environmental conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, Directorate of Public Health of the Republic of Turkey Ministry of
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, EL INF OV
  • [3] In-Service Wind Turbine DFIG Diagnosis Using Current Signature Analysis
    Artigao, Estefania
    Honrubia-Escribano, Andres
    Gomez-Lazaro, Emilio
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2020, 67 (03) : 2262 - 2271
  • [4] Long-Term operational Data Analysis of an In-Service Wind Turbine DFIG
    Artigao, Estefania
    Sapena-Bano, Angel
    Honrubia-Escribano, Andres
    Martinez-Roman, Javier
    Puche-Panadero, Ruben
    Gomez-Lazaro, Emilio
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 17896 - 17906
  • [5] Wind turbine reliability: A comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development
    Artigao, Estefania
    Martin-Martinez, Sergio
    Honrubia-Escribano, Andres
    Gomez-Lazaro, Emilio
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 228 : 1569 - 1583
  • [6] Burton T, 2011, Wind energy handbook
  • [7] Carroll J., 2018, P EWEA ANN EV
  • [8] Reliability, availability, maintainability data review for the identification of trends in offshore wind energy applications
    Cevasco, D.
    Koukoura, S.
    Kolios, A. J.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 136
  • [9] Wind turbine reliability data review and impacts on levelised cost of energy
    Dao, Cuong
    Kazemtabrizi, Behzad
    Crabtree, Christopher
    [J]. WIND ENERGY, 2019, 22 (12) : 1848 - 1871
  • [10] Wind turbine downtime and its importance for offshore deployment
    Faulstich, S.
    Hahn, B.
    Tavner, P. J.
    [J]. WIND ENERGY, 2011, 14 (03) : 327 - 337