Is more always better? How government ecological attention influences corporate environmental responsibility: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

被引:7
作者
Meng, Xiangyan [1 ]
Kong, Fanchao [2 ,3 ]
Fu, Hengshu [2 ]
Li, Shuai [2 ]
Zhang, Kaixiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Insurance, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Math, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Math, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
关键词
Government ecological attention; Corporate environmental responsibility; Urban green innovation; Government environmental support; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; IMPACT; REGULATIONS; CONSTRAINTS; DISCLOSURE; OWNERSHIP; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111686
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Under the concept of sustainability, government attention has become a topical subject of discussion in the environmental management. The text mining techniques in this study are employed to quantify government ecological attention (GEA). Combining with the work reports of Chinese local government in 169 cities and taking the data of Chinese listed companies from 2011 to 2019 as samples, this study adopted text mining method to measure the degree of GEA and empirically analyse its influence on the corporate environmental responsibility (CER). The conclusions suggest that, first, the intensity of GEA is inconsistent between regions, showing significant phase variations. Second, there is an inverted U-shaped relation with GEA and CER, and this conclusion remains plausible after the UTEST test, endogeneity test, and other robustness test. The effects of GEA are more evident in larger firms, heavy polluting industry and Midwest region. Third, urban green innovation and government environmental support significantly weaken the inverted U-shaped relationship. This study highlights the research on government attention in the area of ecological governance, enriches the research content of environmental regulatory theory, and provides a reference for how to promote CER.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Corporate social responsibility versus corporate shareholder responsibility: A family firm perspective [J].
Abeysekera, Amal P. ;
Fernando, Chitru S. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 61
[2]   Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis [J].
Adewuyi, Adeolu O. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 65 :489-506
[3]   Drivers of environmental processes and their impact on performance: a study of Turkish SMEs [J].
Agan, Yavuz ;
Acar, Mehmet Fatih ;
Borodin, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 51 :23-33
[4]   Do credit constraints favor dirty production? Theory and plant-level evidence [J].
Andersen, Dana C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 84 :189-208
[5]   Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance [J].
Anton, WRQ ;
Deltas, G ;
Khanna, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 48 (01) :632-654
[6]   Market valuation of greenhouse gas emissions under a mandatory reporting regime: Evidence from the UK [J].
Baboukardos, Diogenis .
ACCOUNTING FORUM, 2017, 41 (03) :221-233
[7]   Environmental regulation, local legislation and pollution control in China [J].
Bao, Qun ;
Shao, Min ;
Yang, Dali .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2021, 26 (04) :321-339
[8]   How does government attention matter in air pollution control? Evidence from government annual reports [J].
Bao, Rui ;
Liu, Tianle .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 185
[10]   The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China [J].
Cai, Wugan ;
Li, Guangpei .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 176 :110-118