Single-dose NEPA versus an aprepitant regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

被引:9
作者
Zelek, Laurent [1 ,5 ]
Navari, Rudolph [2 ]
Aapro, Matti [3 ]
Scotte, Florian [4 ]
机构
[1] Hop Avicenne, Bobigny, France
[2] WHO, Canc Care Program, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Clin Genolier, Genolier Canc Ctr, Genolier, Switzerland
[4] Gustave Roussy Canc Ctr, Interdisciplinary Canc Course Dept, Villejuif, France
[5] Hop Avicenne, AP HP, Dept Oncol, Grp Hosp Paris Seine St Denis, 25 Rue Stalingrad, F-93000 Bobigny, France
关键词
aprepitant; CINV; NEPA; netupitant; palonosetron; DOUBLE-BLIND; CANCER-PATIENTS; PLACEBO; CINV; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.6121
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Non-inferiority of NEPA (fixed combination of NK1 receptor antagonist (RA), netupitant, and 5-HT(3)RA, palonosetron) versus an aprepitant regimen was previously shown in a pragmatic study in patients receiving anthracycline cyclophosphamide (AC) and non-AC moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). In the MEC group a numerically higher complete response (CR: no emesis, no rescue) rate was seen for NEPA during the overall 0-120 h phase (NEPA 76.1% vs. 63.1% aprepitant). As NEPA exhibits long-lasting efficacy, this study evaluated a prolonged period up to 144 h, beyond the traditional 120 h post-chemotherapy. In this post-hoc analysis we explore the comparative efficacy of NEPA versus the aprepitant regimen in the MEC group up to 144 h, while also assessing the impact of risk factors on CINV prevention.Methods This was a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, prospective study. Oral NEPA was administered as a single dose on day 1, while aprepitant was given on days 1-3 + ondansetron on day 1; all patients were to receive dexamethasone on days 1-4. Patients were chemotherapy-naive and receiving MEC, with a subset evaluation of those with a risk factor for developing CINV (i.e., female, male <60 years, male = 60 years who received carboplatin, or male = 60 years with anxiety). CR rates were compared during the extended overall (0-144 h) phase.Results The MEC group included 211 patients; of these 181 were in the risk factor subset. Significantly higher CR rates were seen for NEPA than aprepitant during the extended overall phase for the total MEC group (NEPA 77.1%, aprepitant 57.8%, p = 0.003) and also in the subset of patients with CINV risk factors (NEPA 73.9%, aprepitant 56.2%, p = 0.012).Conclusion A single dose of NEPA, administered on day 1 only, was more effective than a 3-day aprepitant regimen in preventing CINV for an extended duration in patients receiving MEC and in those with emetic risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:15769 / 15776
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, AK NET PAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, EM APR
[4]  
[Anonymous], OR AK VS STAND CAR P
[5]   A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of a ginger extract in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin [J].
Bossi, P. ;
Cortinovis, D. ;
Fatigoni, S. ;
Rocca, M. Cossu ;
Fabi, A. ;
Seminara, P. ;
Ripamonti, C. ;
Alfieri, S. ;
Granata, R. ;
Bergamini, C. ;
Agustoni, F. ;
Bidoli, P. ;
Nole, F. ;
Pessi, M. A. ;
Macchi, F. ;
Michellini, L. ;
Montanaro, F. ;
Roila, F. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (10) :2547-2551
[6]   Cost-effectiveness of a fixed combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA) relative to aprepitant plus granisetron (APR plus GRAN) for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a trial-based analysis [J].
Botteman, Marc ;
Nickel, Katharina ;
Corman, Shelby ;
Turini, Marco ;
Binder, Gary .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (02) :857-866
[7]  
Cawston Helene, 2017, Drugs Context, V6, P212298, DOI 10.7573/dic.212298
[8]   The development of a prediction tool to identify cancer patients at high risk for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting [J].
Dranitsaris, G. ;
Molassiotis, A. ;
Clemons, M. ;
Roeland, E. ;
Schwartzberg, L. ;
Dielenseger, P. ;
Jordan, K. ;
Young, A. ;
Aapro, M. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (06) :1260-1267
[9]   Exploratory Analysis Comparing Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study (CONSOLE) [J].
Hata, Akito ;
Shiraishi, Yoshimasa ;
Inui, Naoki ;
Okada, Morihito ;
Morise, Masahiro ;
Akiyoshi, Kohei ;
Takeda, Masayuki ;
Watanabe, Yasutaka ;
Sugawara, Shunichi ;
Shinagawa, Naofumi ;
Kubota, Kaoru ;
Saeki, Toshiaki ;
Tamura, Tomohide .
ONCOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2022, 10 (01) :253-262
[10]   Antiemetics: ASCO Guideline Update [J].
Hesketh, Paul J. ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Basch, Ethan ;
Bohlke, Kari ;
Barbour, Sally Y. ;
Clark-Snow, Rebecca Anne ;
Danso, Michael A. ;
Dennis, Kristopher ;
Dupuis, L. Lee ;
Dusetzina, Stacie B. ;
Eng, Cathy ;
Feyer, Petra C. ;
Jordan, Karin ;
Noonan, Kimberly ;
Sparacio, Dee ;
Lyman, Gary H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (24) :2782-+