Making the Cotton District (White): Urban Renewal, New Urbanism, and the Construction of a Nostalgic Neo-Plantationist Pastiche

被引:4
作者
Shelton, Taylor [1 ]
Williams, Brian [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Dept Geosci, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Geosci, Geog, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
anti-Blackness; displacement; new urbanism; urban renewal; whiteness; NEW-YORK; GEOGRAPHIES; PLACE; CITY; COMMUNITY; POLITICS; ATLANTA; SENSE; RACE;
D O I
10.1080/24694452.2023.2168247
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Sometimes heralded as the first ever new urbanist development, Starkville, Mississippi's Cotton District neighborhood stands out as a relatively dense, walkable, and mixed-use neighborhood in the otherwise car-centric landscapes of the rural south. Together with the neighborhood's colorful buildings reminiscent of the grand homes of the antebellum South, these elements obscure the fact that the neighborhood as it exists today is the result of a federally funded urban renewal project that razed much of the adjacent Black neighborhood of Needmore and opened up the present-day Cotton District as a space for new investment. In excavating the details of these different elements of the Cotton District's history, our central conceit is that the Cotton District represents what we call a "nostalgic neo-plantationist pastiche" produced through the material and symbolic displacement of Blackness and its replacement with both material and symbolic whiteness. By conceptualizing this landscape as constituted fundamentally by white nostalgia for a mythical, bygone era of plantation capitalism, and instantiated through a bricolage of architectural and design styles, we seek to draw attention to the precise ways that this landscape actively (re)constructs the past, rather than simply representing it. At the same time, the case of the Cotton District offers an opportunity to reconsider received wisdom in urban design and planning concerning the historic and contemporary linkages between urban renewal and new urbanism, and racial inequality and urban planning more generally.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1171
页数:19
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Adamkiewicz E.A., 2016, Aspeers: Emerging Voices in American Studies, V9, P13, DOI [10.54465/aspeers.09-03, DOI 10.54465/ASPEERS.09-03]
[2]   Digitally Documenting Urban Renewal in Lansing, 1930s-1960s [J].
Aerni-Flessner, John ;
Marks-Wilt, Claire .
MICHIGAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, 2021, 47 (01) :63-92
[3]   The new urbanism: Where and for whom? Investigation of an emergent paradigm [J].
Al-Hindi, KF .
URBAN GEOGRAPHY, 2001, 22 (03) :202-219
[4]  
Alderman DerekH., 2016, The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity, P195, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315613031.CH11
[5]  
Alexander, 2004, E MISSISSIPPI BUSINE, V2
[6]   The hidden histories and geographies of neotraditional town planning: The case of Seaside, Florida [J].
AlHindi, KF ;
Staddon, C .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & SPACE, 1997, 15 (03) :349-372
[7]  
Ammon F., 2018, Preservation Education Research, V10, P11
[8]  
Anderson Martin., 1964, The Federal Bulldozer: A Critical Analysis of Urban Renewal, 1949- 1962
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1969, STARKVILLE DAIL 1220
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1970, STARKVILLE DAIL 1204