Psychometric evaluation of the heart failure somatic perception scale in Iranian heart failure patients: a cross-sectional study

被引:2
作者
Vajargah, Pooyan Ghorbani [1 ]
Jafaraghaee, Fateme [3 ]
Maroufizadeh, Saman [4 ]
Karkhah, Samad [1 ,5 ]
Osuji, Joseph [8 ]
Karami, Samaneh [6 ]
Mirrazeghi, Seyedeh Fatemeh [6 ]
Javadi-Pashaki, Nazila [2 ,7 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Dept ofMed Surg Nursing, Rasht, Iran
[2] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Cardiovasc Dis Res Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Cardiol,Heshmat Hosp, Rasht, Iran
[3] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Rasht, Iran
[4] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Rasht, Iran
[5] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Burn & Regenerat Med Res Ctr, Rasht, Iran
[6] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Cardiovasc Dis Res Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Cardiol,Heshmat Hosp, Rasht, Iran
[7] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr SDHRC, Rasht, Iran
[8] Mt Royal Univ, Fac Hlth Community & Educ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Calgary, AB, Canada
[9] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Cardiovasc Dis Res Ctr, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Nursing, Rasht, Iran
来源
ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY | 2023年 / 85卷 / 11期
关键词
heart failure; psychometric; reliability; sign; symptom; validity; COVARIANCE;
D O I
10.1097/MS9.0000000000001286
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric evaluation of heart failure somatic perception scale (HFSPS) in Iranian heart failure patients.Materials and methods: A total of 220 heart failure (HF) patients were enroled in the study. Data gathering was conducted via consecutive sampling from August 2022 to April 2023. Face validity, content validity, construct validity, and internal consistency were used to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the HFSPS. Construct validity was done through confirmatory factor analysis and convergent validity. Convergent validity between HFSPS and symptom status questionnaire-heart failure was measured using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Cronbach's alpha and Macdonald's omega coefficient were used to evaluate the reliability of instruments.Results: A total of 220 HF patients participated in this study. Their mean age was 66.46 (SD=11.40). Among the participants, 70% were men. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis evaluation showed the goodness of fit indices of the final HFSPS model after modification was within an acceptable range (chi(2)=306.18 P<0.001, Minimum Discrepancy Function Divided by Degrees of Freedom=2.47, Comparative of Fit Index=0.91, Tucker-Lewis index=0.90, Adjusted goodness of fit index=0.81, Parsimonious norm fit index=0.70, root mean square error of approximation=0.082). Convergent validity between HFSPS and symptom status questionnaire-heart failure indicated a positive and significant correlation. Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the HFSPS was 0.868, and McDonald's omega coefficient in the HFSPS was 0.832.Conclusion: Overall, the Persian version of the HFSPS was determined to be a reliable and valid scale among Iranians with HF.
引用
收藏
页码:5396 / 5402
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery
    Agha, Riaz
    Abdall-Razak, Ali
    Crossley, Eleanor
    Dowlut, Naeem
    Iosifidis, Christos
    Mathew, Ginimol
    Beamishaj
    Bashashati, Mohammad
    Millham, Frederick H.
    Orgill, Dennis P.
    Noureldin, Ashraf
    James, Iain
    Alsawadi, Abdulrahman
    Bradley, Patrick J.
    Giordano, Salvatore
    Laskin, Daniel M.
    Basu, Somprakas
    Johnston, Maximilian
    Muensterer, Oliver J.
    Mukherjee, Indraneil
    Chi-Yong, James Ngu
    Valmasoni, Michele
    Pagano, Duilio
    Vasudevan, Baskaran
    Rosin, Richard David
    McCaul, James Anthony
    Albrecht, Jorg
    Hoffman, Jerome R.
    Thorat, Mangesh A.
    Massarut, Samuele
    Thoma, Achilles
    Kirshtein, Boris
    Afifi, Raafat Yahia
    Farooq, Naheed
    Challacombe, Ben
    Pai, Prathamesh S.
    Perakath, Benjamin
    Kadioglu, Huseyin
    Aronson, Jeffrey K.
    Raveendran, Kandiah
    Machado-Aranda, David
    Klappenbach, Roberto
    Healy, Donagh
    Miguel, Diana
    Leles, Claudio Rodrigues
    Ather, M. Hammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 72 : 156 - 165
  • [2] ISSUES IN THE APPLICATION OF COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS - A FURTHER COMMENT
    BAGOZZI, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1983, 9 (04) : 449 - 450
  • [3] Bahrami Masoud, 2014, Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, V19, P56
  • [4] Benjamin EJ, 2019, CIRCULATION, V139, P56, DOI DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000746
  • [5] Benjamin EJ., 2018, CIRCULATION, V137, pe67, DOI DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000573
  • [6] TESTING FOR THE EQUIVALENCE OF FACTOR COVARIANCE AND MEAN STRUCTURES - THE ISSUE OF PARTIAL MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE
    BYRNE, BM
    SHAVELSON, RJ
    MUTHEN, B
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (03) : 456 - 466
  • [7] The multiple mediating effects of illness perceptions and coping strategies on the relationship between physical symptoms and depressive symptoms in patients with heart failure
    Chen, Cancan
    Fang, Wenjie
    An, Yan
    Wang, Lyu
    Fan, Xiuzhen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2020, 19 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [8] Cook David A, 2006, Am J Med, V119
  • [9] Darvishpour A., 2016, J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, V26, P206
  • [10] Dehghanzadeh S., 2015, Iranian J Nursing Res, V9, P36