Perceived usability of collaborative modeling tools

被引:0
作者
Ren, Ranci [1 ]
Castro, John W. [2 ]
Acuna, Santiago R. [3 ]
Dieste, Oscar [4 ]
Acuna, Silvia T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ingn Informat, Calle Francisco Tomas Y Valiente 11,Campus Cantobl, Madrid 28049, Spain
[2] Univ Atacama, Dept Ingn Informat & Ciencias Comp, Av Copayapu 485, Copiapo 1530000, Chile
[3] Univ Autonoma San Luis Potosi, Alvaro Obregon 64, San Luis Potosi 78000, Mexico
[4] Univ Politecn Madrid, Lenguajes & Sistemas Informat Ingn Software, Calle Ciruelos, Boadilla Del Monte 28660, Spain
关键词
Usability; Chatbot; Collaborative modeling tools; Thematic analysis; SOCIO; Creately;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2023.111807
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Context: Online collaborative creation of models is becoming commonplace. Collaborative modeling using chatbots and natural language may lower the barriers to modeling for users from different domains. Objective: We compare the perceived usability of two similarly online collaborative modeling tools, the SOCIO chatbot and the Creately web-based tool. Method: We conducted a crossover experiment with 66 participants. The evaluation instrument was based on the System Usability Scale (SUS). We performed a quantitative and qualitative exploration, employing inferential statistics and thematic analysis. Results: The results indicate that chatbots enabling natural language communication enhance com-munication and collaboration efficiency and improve the user experience. Conclusion: Chatbots need to improve guidance and help for novices, but they appear beneficial for enhancing user experience.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Bangor A, 2009, J USABILITY STUD, V4, P114
  • [2] Begel A., 2010, Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research, FoSER '10, P33
  • [3] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [4] Brooke J., 1996, Usability Eval. Ind., V189, P4, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781498710411-35
  • [5] Current practice in measuring usability:: Challenges to usability studies and research
    Hornbæk, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2006, 64 (02) : 79 - 102
  • [6] Collaboration Tools for Global Software Engineering
    Lanubile, Filippo
    Ebert, Christof
    Prikladnicki, Rafael
    Vizcaino, Aurora
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 2010, 27 (02) : 52 - 55
  • [7] Are the UML modelling tools powerful enough for practitioners? A literature review
    Ozkaya, Mert
    [J]. IET SOFTWARE, 2019, 13 (05) : 338 - 354
  • [8] Collaborative Modeling and Group Decision Making Using Chatbots in Social Network
    Perez-Soler, Sara
    Guerra, Esther
    de Lara, Juan
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 2018, 35 (06) : 48 - 54
  • [9] Pérez-Soler S, 2017, IEEE INT CONF AUTOM, P723, DOI 10.1109/ASE.2017.8115683
  • [10] Ren Ranci, 2020, EASE2020. Proceedings of the Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, P260, DOI 10.1145/3383219.3383246