Dynamic and dependent tree theory (D2T2): A framework for the analysis of fault trees with dependent basic events

被引:22
作者
Andrews, John [1 ]
Tolo, Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Resilience Engn Res Grp, Nottingham, England
关键词
Fault tree analysis; Binary decision diagrams; Dependency models; Petri nets; Markov models; RELIABILITY; ALGORITHM; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2022.108959
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Fault tree analysis remains the most commonly employed method, particularly in the safety critical industries, to predict the probability or frequency of system failures. Whilst it has its origins back in the 1960s, the assumptions employed in the majority of commercial fault tree analysis codes have not changed significantly since this time and restrict the ability of the method to represent features of the design, operation and maintenance of modern industrial systems. The inability to include general dependencies between the basic events, the requirement for invariant failure and repair rates, and the inability to account for complex maintenance strategies are major limitations. This paper proposes a new fault tree analysis framework which can overcome these restrictions. Whilst retaining the fault tree structure to express the causality of the system failure, the internal calculation method is updated by exploiting features of the Binary Decision Diagram, Stochastic Petri Net and Markov methods. The key elements of the (DT2)-T-2 algorithm are described in detail and the framework demonstrated through application to a case study example of a pressure vessel cooling system.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Andrews JD, 2002, RELIABILITY RISK ASS, V2nd, P540
[2]   A stochastic model for railway track asset management [J].
Andrews, John ;
Prescott, Darren ;
de Rozieres, Florian .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 130 :76-84
[3]   How useful is quantitative risk assessment? [J].
Apostolakis, GE .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2004, 24 (03) :515-520
[4]   The effects of tamping on railway track geometry degradation [J].
Audley, M. ;
Andrews, J. D. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART F-JOURNAL OF RAIL AND RAPID TRANSIT, 2013, 227 (04) :376-391
[5]   Choosing a heuristic for the "fault tree to binary decision diagram" conversion, using neural networks [J].
Bartlett, LM ;
Andrews, JD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2002, 51 (03) :344-349
[6]  
Bouissou M, 1997, P EUR SAF REL ASS C, P2045
[7]   Analysis of truncation limit in probabilistic safety assessment [J].
Cepin, M .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2005, 87 (03) :395-403
[8]   A general framework for dependability modelling coupling discrete-event and time-driven simulation [J].
Chiacchio, Ferdinando ;
Iacono, Alessandra ;
Compagno, Lucio ;
D'Urso, Diego .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 199 (199)
[9]   Reduction of Petri net maintenance modeling complexity via Approximate Bayesian Computation [J].
Chiachio, Manuel ;
Saleh, Ali ;
Naybour, Susannah ;
Chiachio, Juan ;
Andrews, John .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 222
[10]   INTERVAL RELIABILITY FOR INITIATING AND ENABLING EVENTS [J].
DUNGLINSON, C ;
LAMBERT, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1983, 32 (02) :150-163