The modeling of risk perception in the use of structural health monitoring information for optimal maintenance decisions

被引:24
作者
Chadha, Mayank [1 ]
Ramancha, Mukesh K. [1 ]
Vega, Manuel A. [2 ]
Conte, Joel P. [1 ]
Todd, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Struct Engn 0085, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
Expected utility theory; Risk profile; Behavioral economics; Bayesian inference; Structural health monitoring; Miter gates; PROSPECT-THEORY; UNCERTAINTY; SUBJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2022.108845
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper proposes an approach to select a maintenance strategy from a predefined set of choices considering the decision maker's behavioral risk profile. It is assumed that the damage state is characterized by a continuous state parameter probabilistically inferred from observable sensor data. This work applies an engineering application of consequence-based decision-making incorporating the acceptable risk intensity of the decision -maker, i.e., the decision-maker's (individual or an organization) valuation of the outcome of a decision, using a risk profile model. The utility of a decision-maker is subjective, and this paper considers the fact that different decision-makers mentally assign a different importance factor (the utility) to the seriousness or urgency to take necessary actions with the increasing intensity of structural damage. The approach herein incorporates a layer of human psychology on selecting appropriate maintenance strategies that not only depend on the posterior distribution of unmeasurable damage state but also consider the behavioral risk profile of the decision-maker. The collective decision-making of an organization consisting of many individuals is also investigated. The approach is exemplified in a case study involving life cycle monitoring of a miter gate, part of a lock system enabling navigation of inland waterways.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1763, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, DOI DOI 10.1098/RSTL.1763.0053
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making, DOI 10.1037/e412982005-012
[4]  
Arrow K., 1971, Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing
[5]   Assessing uncertainty in extreme events: Applications to risk-based decision making in interdependent infrastructure sectors [J].
Barker, Kash ;
Haimes, Yacov Y. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (04) :819-829
[6]  
Benjamin J.R., 1970, Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers
[7]   EXPOSITION OF A NEW THEORY ON THE MEASUREMENT OF RISK [J].
Bernoulli, Daniel .
ECONOMETRICA, 1954, 22 (01) :23-36
[8]   An application of Prospect Theory to a SHM-based decision problem [J].
Bolognani, Denise ;
Verzobio, Andrea ;
Tonelli, Daniel ;
Cappello, Carlo ;
Glisic, Branko ;
Zonta, Daniele .
HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2017, 2017, 10170
[9]   Optimization of maintenance strategies for railway track-bed considering probabilistic degradation models and different reliability levels [J].
Bressi, Sara ;
Santos, Joao ;
Losa, Massimo .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 207
[10]  
Buchanan L, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P32