Comparative transcriptome analysis of gene responses of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive rice cultivars to salt stress

被引:14
|
作者
Fang, Xin [1 ]
Mo, Junjie [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Hongkai [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Xuefeng [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Yuling [1 ]
Xu, Jianghuan [1 ]
Yang, Shan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Ocean Univ, Coll Coastal Agr Sci, Zhanjiang 524088, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Saline Alkali Tolerant Rice Technol Innovat C, South China Branch, Zhanjiang 524088, Peoples R China
关键词
GROWTH; IDENTIFICATION; ANNOTATION; METABOLISM; EXPRESSION; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-46389-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Salt stress is one unfavorable factor of global climate change that adversely affects rice plant growth and yield. To identify novel salt-tolerant genes and new varieties of salt-tolerant rice, a better understanding of the molecular regulation mechanism of salt tolerance in rice is needed. In this study we used transcriptome analyses to examine changes in gene expression of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive rice plants. The salt-tolerant cultivar HH11 and salt-sensitive cultivar IR29 were treated with 200 mM NaCl solution for 0 h, 6 h, 24 h and 48 h at the three leaf stage. Physiological parameters and transcriptome were measured and analyzed after each treatment. Activity of SOD and POD, as well as the MDA and protein content of the two rice cultivars generally increased with increasing time of exposure to NaCl. Meanwhile, the APX activity first increased, then decreased in both cultivars, with maximum values seen at 6 h for IR29 and at 24 h for HH11. The GR and GPX activity of HH11 were stronger than that of IR29 in response to salt stress. The H2O2 content first increased at 0-6 h, then decreased at 6-24 h, and then increased again at 24-48 h under salt stress. Compared with IR29, SOD, POD and APX activity of HH11 was more sluggish in response to salt stress, reaching the maximum at 24 h or 48 h. The MDA, H2O2 and proline content of HH11 was lower than that of IR29 under salt stress. Relative to untreated HH11 plants (0 h) and those exposed to salt for 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h (H0-H6, H0-H24 and H0-H48), 7462, 6363 and 6636, differentially expressed genes (DEGs), respectively, were identified. For IR29, the respective total DEGs were 7566, 6075 and 6136. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis showed that metabolic pathways related to antioxidative responses and osmotic balance played vital roles in salt stress tolerance. Sucrose and starch metabolism, in addition to flavonoid biosynthesis and glutathione metabolism, showed positive responses to salt stress. Expression of two SPS genes (LOC_Os01g69030 and LOC_Os08g20660) and two GST genes (LOC_Os06g12290 and LOC_Os10g38740) was up-regulated in both HH11 and IR29, whereas expression of LOC_Os09g12660, a glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase gene, and two SS genes (LOC_Os04g17650 and LOC_Os04g24430) was up-regulated differential expression in HH11. The results showed that HH11 had more favorable adjustment in antioxidant and osmotic activity than IR29 upon exposure to salt stress, and highlighted candidate genes that could play roles in the function and regulation mechanism of salt tolerance in rice.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative transcriptome analysis of gene responses of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive rice cultivars to salt stress
    Xin Fang
    Junjie Mo
    Hongkai Zhou
    Xuefeng Shen
    Yuling Xie
    Jianghuan Xu
    Shan Yang
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [2] Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Salt-Tolerant and -Sensitive Soybean Cultivars under Salt Stress
    Cheng, Ye
    Cheng, Xiangqiang
    Wei, Kai
    Wang, Yan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2024, 25 (18)
  • [3] The influence of host genotype and salt stress on the seed endophytic community of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant rice cultivars
    Walitang, Denver I.
    Kim, Chang-Gi
    Kim, Kiyoon
    Kang, Yeongyeong
    Kim, Young Kee
    Sa, Tongmin
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [4] The influence of host genotype and salt stress on the seed endophytic community of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant rice cultivars
    Denver I. Walitang
    Chang-Gi Kim
    Kiyoon Kim
    Yeongyeong Kang
    Young Kee Kim
    Tongmin Sa
    BMC Plant Biology, 18
  • [5] ANTIOXIDANT RESPONSE TO NACL STRESS IN SALT-TOLERANT AND SALT-SENSITIVE CULTIVARS OF COTTON
    GOSSETT, DR
    MILLHOLLON, EP
    LUCAS, MC
    CROP SCIENCE, 1994, 34 (03) : 706 - 714
  • [6] Divergences in morphological changes and antioxidant responses in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive rice seedlings after salt stress
    Lee, Min Hee
    Cho, Eun Ju
    Wi, Seung Gon
    Bae, Hyoungwoo
    Kim, Ji Eun
    Cho, Jae-Young
    Lee, Sungbeom
    Kim, Jin-Hong
    Chung, Byung Yeoup
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 70 : 325 - 335
  • [7] Comparative transcriptome analysis of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant maize reveals potential mechanisms to enhance salt resistance
    Mingquan Wang
    Yufeng Wang
    Yifei Zhang
    Chunxia Li
    Shichen Gong
    Shuqin Yan
    Guoliang Li
    Guanghui Hu
    Honglei Ren
    Jianfei Yang
    Tao Yu
    Kejun Yang
    Genes & Genomics, 2019, 41 : 781 - 801
  • [8] Comparative transcriptome analysis of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant maize reveals potential mechanisms to enhance salt resistance
    Wang, Mingquan
    Wang, Yufeng
    Zhang, Yifei
    Li, Chunxia
    Gong, Shichen
    Yan, Shuqin
    Li, Guoliang
    Hu, Guanghui
    Ren, Honglei
    Yang, Jianfei
    Yu, Tao
    Yang, Kejun
    GENES & GENOMICS, 2019, 41 (07) : 781 - 801
  • [9] Differential Physiological Responses to Salt Stress between Salt-Sensitive and Salt-Tolerant japonica Rice Cultivars at the Post-Germination and Seedling Stages
    Ye, Shenghai
    Huang, Zhibo
    Zhao, Guibin
    Zhai, Rongrong
    Ye, Jing
    Wu, Mingming
    Yu, Faming
    Zhu, Guofu
    Zhang, Xiaoming
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (11):
  • [10] Transcriptional analysis of salt-responsive genes to salinity stress in three salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive Barely cultivars
    Mohammadi, Seyyed Abolghasem
    Hamian, Samira
    Vahed, Mohammad Moghaddam
    Bandehagh, Ali
    Gohari, Gholamreza
    Janda, Tibor
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2021, 141 : 457 - 465