The role of supraglottic airway devices in obstetric anaesthesia

被引:3
作者
Metodiev, Yavor [1 ,3 ]
Mushambi, Mary [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Wales, Dept Anaesthet, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Univ Leicester, Med Sch, Leicester, England
[3] Univ Hosp Wales, Dept Anaesthet, Heath Pk Way, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales
关键词
aspiration; failed intubation; general anaesthesia; obstetric; supraglottic airway device; FAILED TRACHEAL INTUBATION; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; CESAREAN DELIVERY; GASTRIC ULTRASOUND; SECTION; VOLUME; ANESTHETISTS; MANAGEMENT; DIFFICULT;
D O I
10.1097/ACO.0000000000001241
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose of reviewTo discuss the role of supraglottic airway devices as rescue and primary airway devices in pregnant patients.Recent findingsGeneral anaesthesia in pregnant patients is associated with increased incidence of difficult and failed intubation, especially when performed for caesarean deliveries. The Difficult Airway Society and the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association guidelines for the management of failed intubation recommend the use of second-generation supraglottic airway devices as a rescue airway strategy when failed intubation occurs. This practice is now widely accepted and embedded in routine teaching and clinical practice. On the other hand, there is little but growing evidence describing the use of supraglottic airway devices as the primary airway device and an alternative to endotracheal intubation for patients undergoing elective and emergency caesarean deliveries under general anaesthesia. Most of the published research supporting this practice was done on carefully selected patients who were nonobese and who did not have gastroesophageal reflux or anticipated difficult airway. Despite demonstrating high insertion success rates and low complication rates, these studies were underpowered and have thus far, failed to provide robust data on the true risk of aspiration in this setting.Based on current scientific data, the evidence for the safe use of supraglottic airway devices as primary airway devices during general anaesthesia for caesarean deliveries is not compelling. However, their use as rescue airway devices remains a well established strategy supported by international guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 280
页数:5
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Ahmed F, 2015, Ain Shams J Anaesthesiol, V8, P511
[2]  
Amin S, 2016, J Anesth Clin Res, V7, P1, DOI DOI 10.4172/2155-6148.1000605
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Anesthesiology, V126, p376 93
[4]   Gastric ultrasound in the third trimester of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial to develop a predictive model of volume assessment [J].
Arzola, C. ;
Perlas, A. ;
Siddiqui, N. T. ;
Downey, K. ;
Ye, X. Y. ;
Carvalho, J. C. A. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 73 (03) :295-303
[5]   Obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK: a descriptive analysis of the National Obstetric Anaesthetic Database 2009-14 [J].
Bamber, James H. ;
Lucas, Dominique N. ;
Plaat, Felicity ;
Russell, Robin .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (04) :580-587
[6]   Physiology of pregnancy: clinical anaesthetic implications [J].
Bedson, Ruth ;
Riccoboni, Anna .
BJA EDUCATION, 2014, 14 (02) :69-72
[7]   Pregnancy and Labor Epidural Effects on Gastric Emptying: A Prospective Comparative Study [J].
Bouvet, Lionel ;
Schulz, Thomas ;
Piana, Federica ;
Desgranges, Francois-Pierrick ;
Chassard, Dominique .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 136 (04) :542-550
[8]   Prevalence of risk stomach in laboring women allowed to unrestrictive oral intake: a comparative cross-sectional study [J].
Chang, Xiang-Yang ;
Wang, Li-Zhong ;
Xia, Feng ;
Zhang, Yin-Fa .
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
[9]   Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: Anaesthesia [J].
Cook, T. M. ;
Woodall, N. ;
Frerk, C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (05) :617-631
[10]   Major complications of airway management: a prospective multicentre observational study [J].
Cumberworth, A. ;
Lewith, H. ;
Sud, A. ;
Jefferson, H. ;
Athanassoglou, V ;
Pandit, J. J. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 77 (06) :640-648