Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients with Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis

被引:12
作者
Wang, Yang [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoke [1 ]
Liu, Kun [2 ]
Liu, Ruijuan [1 ]
Li, Liangliang [2 ]
Yin, Chaoshan [2 ]
Song, Peixing [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhuhai Hosp, Zhuhai Golden Bay Ctr Hosp, Dept Urol, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Fuyang Hosp, Dept Urol, Fuyang, Peoples R China
关键词
Gleason score upgrading; Prostate cancer; Risk factors; Meta-analysis; PERINEURAL INVASION; GRADING SYSTEM; BIOPSY; RISK; SIZE; CANDIDATES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1159/000528873
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Previous studies have revealed that Gleason score upgrading (GSU) was closely related to an increased biochemical recurrence rate and adverse oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the predictive factors for GSU following radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: We performed an extensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane in September 2022. In order to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals, a fixed effect or a DerSimonian and Laird random effect was applied. Results: Twenty-six studies included 18,745 PC patients that were available for further analysis. Our results revealed that GSU was significantly correlated with age (summary SMD = 0.13; p = 0.004), prostate volume (PV) (summary SMD = -0.19;p < 0.001), preoperative PSA (p-PSA) (summary SMD = 0.18; p < 0.001), PSA density (PSAD) (summary SMD = 0.40; p < 0.001), number of positive cores (summary SMD = 0.28; p = 0.001), percentage of positive cores (summary SMD = 0.36; p < 0.001), Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) scores (>3/<= 3) (summary OR = 2.27; p = 0.001), clinical T stage (>T2/<= T2) (summary OR = 1.73; p < 0.001), positive surgical margins (PSM) ( summary OR = 2.12; p < 0.001), extraprostatic extension (EPE) (summary OR = 2.73; p < 0.001), pathological T stage (>T2/<= T2) (summary OR = 3.45; p < 0.001), perineural invasion (PNI) (summary OR = 2.40; p = 0.008), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (summary SMD = 0.50; p < 0.001). However, we found that GSU was not significantly correlated with body mass index (BMI) (summary SMD = -0.02; p = 0.602). Moreover, our sensitivity and subgroup analyses showed that the findings were reliable. Conclusions: Age, PV, p-PSA, PSAD, number of positive cores, percentage of positive cores, PI-RADS score, clinical T stage, PSM, EPE, pathological T stage, PNI, and NLR are independent factors predicting GSU following RP. The findings may be helpful in risk stratification and personalized treatment in PC patients. (c) 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 479
页数:20
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI PIRADS scoring system [J].
Alqahtani, Saeed ;
Wei, Cheng ;
Zhang, Yilong ;
Szewczyk-Bieda, Magdalena ;
Wilson, Jennifer ;
Huang, Zhihong ;
Nabi, Ghulam .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[2]   Investigating association of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy with Gleason score upgrading at prostatectomy: A multi-institutional analysis [J].
Barsky, Andrew R. ;
Kraus, Ryan D. ;
Carmona, Ruben ;
Santos, Patricia M. G. ;
Li, Carrie ;
Schwartz, Lauren E. ;
Ballas, Leslie K. ;
Vapiwala, Neha .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (10) :3383-3389
[3]   The Impact of Discordance Between Biopsy and Pathological Gleason Scores on Survival After Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Crispen, Paul L. ;
Rangel, Laureano J. ;
Bergstralh, Eric J. ;
Sebo, Thomas J. ;
Blute, Michael L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (01) :95-104
[4]   Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology [J].
Chun, FKH ;
Steuber, T ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Currlin, E ;
Walz, J ;
Schlomm, T ;
Haese, A ;
Heinzer, H ;
McCormack, M ;
Huland, H ;
Graefen, M ;
Karakiewicz, PI .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) :820-826
[5]   Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: The Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis [J].
Cohen, Michael S. ;
Hanley, Robert S. ;
Kurteva, Teodora ;
Ruthazer, Robin ;
Silverman, Mark L. ;
Sorcini, Andrea ;
Hamawy, Karim ;
Roth, Robert A. ;
Tuerk, Ingolf ;
Libertino, John A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (02) :371-381
[6]   Prostate Size as a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Low Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Davies, Judson D. ;
Aghazadeh, Monty A. ;
Phillips, Sharon ;
Salem, Shady ;
Chang, Sam S. ;
Clark, Peter E. ;
Cookson, Michael S. ;
Davis, Rodney ;
Herrell, S. Duke ;
Penson, David F. ;
Smith, Joseph A., Jr. ;
Barocas, Daniel A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06) :2221-2227
[7]  
de Cobelli Ottavio, 2015, Urol Oncol, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.02.004
[8]   Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictive Factors Using the Modified Gleason Grading System and Factoring in Tertiary Grades [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Pierorazio, Phillip M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (05) :1019-1024
[9]   The clinical predictive factors and postoperative histopathological parameters associated with upgrading after radical prostatectomy: A contemporary analysis with grade groups [J].
Erdem, Selcuk ;
Verep, Samed ;
Bagbudar, Sidar ;
Ozluk, Yasemin ;
Sanli, Oner ;
Ozcan, Faruk .
PROSTATE, 2020, 80 (02) :225-234
[10]   Neutrophil, Platelets, and Eosinophil to Lymphocyte Ratios Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients [J].
Ferro, Matteo ;
Musi, Gennaro ;
Serino, Alessandro ;
Cozzi, Gabriele ;
Mistretta, Francesco Alessandro ;
Costa, Beatrice ;
Bianchi, Roberto ;
Cordima, Giovanni ;
Luzzago, Stefano ;
Di Trapani, Ettore ;
Tagliabue, Elena ;
Vartolomei, Mihai Dorin ;
Terracciano, Daniela ;
Cassatella, Maria C. ;
Salvatici, Michela ;
Conti, Andrea ;
Sandri, Maria Teresa ;
Cioffi, Antonio ;
Turetti, Matteo ;
Catellani, Michele ;
Bottero, Danilo ;
Matei, Deliu Victor ;
Mirone, Vincenzo ;
de Cobelli, Ottavio .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 102 (01) :43-50