Cost-effectiveness of volunteer and contract ground-based shooting of sambar deer in Australia

被引:14
作者
Comte, Sebastien [1 ]
Thomas, Elaine [2 ]
Bengsen, Andrew J. J. [1 ]
Bennett, Ami [3 ]
Davis, Naomi E. E. [3 ,4 ]
Brown, Daniel [5 ]
Forsyth, David M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] NSW Dept Primary Ind, Vertebrate Pest Res Unit, 1447 Forest Rd, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
[2] Pk Victoria, Mt Beauty, Vic 3699, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Sch Biosci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[4] Pk Victoria, 535 Bourke St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[5] Pk Victoria, Bright, Vic 3741, Australia
关键词
biological invasions; catch per unit effort; Cervus unicolor; contract shooters; CPUE; culling; GPS; invasive species; ungulates; volunteer shooters; wildlife management; WHITE-TAILED DEER; RED DEER; MOVEMENT BEHAVIOR; RUSA-UNICOLOR; R PACKAGE; ROE DEER; MANAGEMENT; ABUNDANCE; HUNTERS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1071/WR22030
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context, Introduced sambar deer (Cervus unicolor) are increasing in south-eastern Australia, and both volunteer and contract ground-based shooters are being used by management agencies to control their undesirable impacts. However, little is known about the effectiveness and costs of volunteer and contract shooters for controlling deer populations in Australia. Aims. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of volunteer and contract ground-based shooters for controlling sambar deer and their impacts in a 5-year management program conducted in and around alpine peatlands in Alpine National Park, Victoria. Methods. Ground-based shooting operations were organised in two blocks. Within each block, four similar to 4200-ha management units were delimited, of which two were randomly assigned as treatment (ground-based shooting) and two as non-treatment (no organised ground-based shooting). In the treatment units, ground-based shooting was conducted using either volunteers or contractors. Each shooting team recorded their effort and the numbers of deer seen and shot, and used a GPS to record their track log and the time and locations of deer shot. Key costs were recorded for both shooter types. Key results. The catch per unit effort of contract shooters was four times greater than that of volunteer shooters. Both shooter types were most effective during the first half of the night and prior to sunrise, and when using a vehicle with a spotlight or walking with thermal-vision equipment. During the day, the use of gundogs to indicate deer significantly increased the success rate of volunteer shooters. Both volunteer and contract shooters used roads and tracks to move in the landscape, but contractors covered more ground than did volunteers. After accounting for key operational costs, the cost per deer killed was 10.1% higher for contract than volunteer shooters. Conclusions. The effectiveness of ground-based shooters is increased by operating at night using vehicles, spotlights and thermal-vision equipment. Contract shooters kill sambar deer at a faster rate, but are slightly more expensive per deer killed, than are volunteer shooters.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 656
页数:15
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Australian Department of the Environment, 2015, NAT REC PLAN ALP SPH
[2]  
BATCHELER C. L., 1963, NEW ZEALAND FOREST RES NOTES, V27, P1
[3]   Weather conditions during hunting season affect the number of harvested roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) [J].
Baur, Sophie ;
Peters, Wibke ;
Oettenheym, Tobias ;
Menzel, Annette .
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (15) :10178-10191
[4]   Effectiveness and costs of helicopter-based shooting of deer [J].
Bengsen, Andrew J. ;
Forsyth, David M. ;
Pople, Anthony ;
Brennan, Michael ;
Amos, Matt ;
Leeson, Mal ;
Cox, Tarnya E. ;
Gray, Bec ;
Orgill, Ollie ;
Hampton, Jordan O. ;
Crittle, Troy ;
Haebich, Kym .
WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 50 (09) :617-631
[5]   A systematic review of ground-based shooting to control overabundant mammal populations [J].
Bengsen, Andrew J. ;
Forsyth, David M. ;
Harris, Stephen ;
Latham, A. David M. ;
McLeod, Steven R. ;
Pople, Anthony .
WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 47 (03) :197-207
[6]   Can recreational hunting contribute to pest mammal control on public land in Australia? [J].
Bengsen, Andrew J. ;
Sparkes, Jessica .
MAMMAL REVIEW, 2016, 46 (04) :297-310
[7]   Dynamic Approach to Space and Habitat Use Based on Biased Random Bridges [J].
Benhamou, Simon .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (01)
[8]   Incorporating Movement Behavior and Barriers to Improve Kernel Home Range Space Use Estimates [J].
Benhamou, Simon ;
Cornelis, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (06) :1353-1360
[9]   Culling Reduces Fecal Pellet Deposition by Introduced Sambar (Rusa unicolor) in a Protected Water Catchment [J].
Bennett, Ami ;
Haydon, Shane ;
Stevens, Melita ;
Coulson, Graeme .
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2015, 39 (02) :268-275
[10]  
Bentley A, 1998, An Introduction to the Deer of Australia: With Special Reference to Victoria