Unveiling cognitive structure and comparative advantages of countries in knowledge domains

被引:4
|
作者
Munoz-Ecija, Teresa [1 ]
Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin [1 ]
Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Zaida [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Fac Commun & Documentat, Dept Informat & Commun, Campus Cartuja S-N, Granada 18071, Spain
[2] CSIC Inst Publ Goods & Policies IPP, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Co-word analysis; informetrics; keyword activity index; nanoscience and nanotechnology; science mapping; WORD ANALYSIS; COMBINED COCITATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOSCIENCE; SCIENCE; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; SPECIALIZATION; TECHNOLOGY; COVERAGE; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1177/01655515221084607
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Mapping and depicting the structure, dynamics and national specialisation profiles of scientific fields at the country level affords a better understanding of national developments and changes in a given field, particularly when these changes may serve as an aid in decision-making with regard to research management. This article looks at the cognitive structure of a field over time to characterise its development across countries and to appraise the competitiveness of countries in terms of research specialisation. Based on a dataset extracted from the Scopus database, we conducted a co-word analysis and studied the degree of specialisation based on publications and on keywords, in the Nanoscience and Nanotechnology field (NST). The results reveal that NST research tends to focus on nano applications and devices. According to the keyword activity index, the countries studied centre their specialisation on electronic, biotechnology and biomedical research, certain countries showing a more competitive edge in the global realm of output. Accordingly, implications that could contribute to decision-making regarding the economy and research policies are described.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 161
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparative exploration of Turkish and Irish curricula via TIMSS cognitive domains
    Cil, Osman
    ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (02): : 434 - 452
  • [22] Cognitive diagnostic assessment based on knowledge structure
    Huang, Sue-Fen
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION 2017 (IMETI 2017), 2018, 169
  • [23] Cognitive structure, content knowledge, and classificatory reasoning
    Ni, YJ
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 159 (03): : 280 - 296
  • [24] Structure and grouping of product domains for organizing design engineering knowledge
    Vroom, R
    ten Herkel, C
    Blomaard, S
    APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL TECHNIQUES IN INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING-CAID&CD' 2005, 2005, : 658 - 663
  • [25] The Knowledge Structure and Core Journals Analysis of Crop Science Based on Mapping Knowledge Domains
    Liu, Minjuan
    Chen, Lu
    Yuan, Xue
    Wang, Ting
    Yan, Yun
    Wang, Yuefei
    COMPUTER AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE IX, CCTA 2015, PT II, 2016, 479 : 392 - 403
  • [26] Unveiling the symptoms of Dutch disease: A comparative and sustainable analysis of two oil-rich countries
    Udemba, Edmund Ntom
    Yalcintas, Selin
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 79
  • [27] Metacognitive knowledge and experience across multiple cognitive domains in euthymic bipolar disorder
    Torres, Ivan J.
    Hidiroglu, Ceren
    Mackala, Sylvia A.
    Ahn, Sharon
    Yatham, Lakshmi N.
    Ozerdem, Eysegul
    Michalak, Erin E.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 64 (01)
  • [28] Honey production competitiveness between the Visegrad countries analysis based on the relative comparative advantages indices
    Illes, Balint Csaba
    Oravecz, Titanilla
    Zufan, Pavel
    Sedik, Peter
    Mucha, Laszlo
    ECONOMIC ANNALS-XXI, 2021, 189 (5-6): : 57 - 68
  • [29] CZECH AGRARIAN FOREIGN TRADE - COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES DISTRIBUTION IN RELATION TO OECD AND DEVELOPING AND TRANSITIONAL COUNTRIES
    Vacek, Tomas
    Smutka, Lubos
    AGRARIAN PERSPECTIVES XXVI: COMPETITIVENESS OF EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECTORS, 2017, : 432 - 438
  • [30] Reactance, Restoration, and Cognitive Structure: Comparative Statics
    Bessarabova, Elena
    Fink, Edward L.
    Turner, Monique
    HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (03) : 339 - 364