Unveiling cognitive structure and comparative advantages of countries in knowledge domains

被引:4
|
作者
Munoz-Ecija, Teresa [1 ]
Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin [1 ]
Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Zaida [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Fac Commun & Documentat, Dept Informat & Commun, Campus Cartuja S-N, Granada 18071, Spain
[2] CSIC Inst Publ Goods & Policies IPP, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Co-word analysis; informetrics; keyword activity index; nanoscience and nanotechnology; science mapping; WORD ANALYSIS; COMBINED COCITATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOSCIENCE; SCIENCE; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; SPECIALIZATION; TECHNOLOGY; COVERAGE; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1177/01655515221084607
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Mapping and depicting the structure, dynamics and national specialisation profiles of scientific fields at the country level affords a better understanding of national developments and changes in a given field, particularly when these changes may serve as an aid in decision-making with regard to research management. This article looks at the cognitive structure of a field over time to characterise its development across countries and to appraise the competitiveness of countries in terms of research specialisation. Based on a dataset extracted from the Scopus database, we conducted a co-word analysis and studied the degree of specialisation based on publications and on keywords, in the Nanoscience and Nanotechnology field (NST). The results reveal that NST research tends to focus on nano applications and devices. According to the keyword activity index, the countries studied centre their specialisation on electronic, biotechnology and biomedical research, certain countries showing a more competitive edge in the global realm of output. Accordingly, implications that could contribute to decision-making regarding the economy and research policies are described.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 161
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COGNITIVE TRAJECTORIES BY CUMULATIVE ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES: EXPLORING DIFFERENT COGNITIVE DOMAINS
    Lyu, J.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2013, 53 : 472 - 473
  • [2] Biofuels in developing countries: Are comparative advantages enough?
    Doku, Angela
    Di Falco, Salvatore
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 44 : 101 - 117
  • [3] Strategic knowledge management: creating comparative advantages
    Kasper, Helmut
    Muehlbacher, Juergen
    Mueller, Barbara
    STRATEGIC CHANGE-BRIEFINGS IN ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE, 2008, 17 (1-2): : 35 - 42
  • [4] The Analysis of Comparative Advantages of Main Soybean Producing Countries
    Jiang, Lili
    Guo, Xiangyu
    Wei, Donghui
    ADVANCED MATERIALS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2011, 271-273 : 872 - +
  • [5] Cognitive Linguistics: Analysis of Mapping Knowledge Domains
    Alduais, Ahmed
    Al-Khawlani, Ammar
    Almaghlouth, Shrouq
    Alfadda, Hind
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 10 (04)
  • [6] Balance of Comparative Advantages in the Processed Food Sector of the Danube Countries
    Ignjatijevic, Svetlana
    Milojevic, Ivan
    Cvijanovic, Gorica
    Jandric, Mersida
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (06): : 6976 - 6993
  • [7] Politics by many other means: The comparative strategic advantages of operational domains
    Lindsay, Jon R.
    Gartzke, Erik
    JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC STUDIES, 2022, 45 (05) : 743 - 776
  • [8] Capital structure specificity in knowledge-intensive industries: A comparative study of EU countries
    Gostkowska-Drzewicka, Magdalena
    Koralun-Bereznicka, Julia
    JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION, 2025, 21 (01) : 99 - 120
  • [9] Unveiling the Structure of Cognitive Vulnerability for Depression: Specificity and Overlap
    Marchetti, Igor
    Loeys, Tom
    Alloy, Lauren B.
    Koster, Ernst H. W.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [10] POLISH SUGAR TRADE AND COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES DISTRIBUTION IN RELATION TO PARTNER COUNTRIES
    Smutka, Lubos
    Pawlak, Karolina
    Kotyza, Pavel
    Pulkrabek, Josef
    Zielinska-Chmielewska, Anna
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2019, 135 (7-8): : 262 - 268