Seismic response analysis of Dagangshan arch dam during 2022 Luding Ms 6.8 earthquake using source-to-structure simulation

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Meng-Zhong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiang-Chao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jin-Ting [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Jian-Wen [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Hui-Bao [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Hydraul Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Water Resources, Key Lab Hydrosphere Sci, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[4] Dadu River Hydropower Dev Co Ltd, CHN Energy Grp, Chengdu 610000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Luding earthquake; Source to structure; Free -field input; Seismic response; Arch dam; DOMAIN REDUCTION METHOD; GROUND MOTION; LOCALIZED REGIONS; ELEMENT-METHOD; PART II; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108492
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The source-to-structure simulation, bridging the gap between regional wavefield simulation and seismic response analysis of local structures, holds promise for predicting the seismic response of arch dams in potential earthquakes. However, accurately forecasting fault rupture processes for potential earthquakes and obtaining highresolution velocity structures for most regions remain significant challenges. This paper is to investigate the viability of the source-to-structure simulation framework for predicting seismic responses of dams in regions with the limited accessible data. For this purpose, the seismic response of Dagangshan arch dam during the 2022 Luding Ms 6.8 earthquake is analyzed as a case study. The multidimension source model is constructed using an accessible preliminary source inversion results within a limited frequency band, and the velocity structures are obtained by modifying the available tomography model. The results demonstrate a strong consistency between the simulated seismic response and the observations, indicating that the source-to-dam simulation is robust. Furthermore, two earthquake input mechanisms, the internal input method and the free field input model, are compared for weak coupling strategy within the source-to-dam simulation framework. It is proven that the free field input method exhibits comparable feasibility to the internal input method and saves the computation requirements for implementing the source-to-dam simulation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Dynamic response analysis of Dagangshan arch dam under the Sichuan Luding Ms 6.8 earthquake
    Jiang D.
    Huang H.
    Qi Y.
    Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 43 (01): : 59 - 74
  • [2] Analysis of working behavior of transverse joints and dampers of Dagangshan arch dam during Luding Ms6.8 earthquake
    Jiang, De-Jun
    Huang, Hui-Bao
    Ju, Shu-Jun
    Gao, Qiang
    Jiang, Ming-Cheng
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2024, 45 (05) : 1527 - 1539
  • [3] A framework for seismic response analysis of dams using numerical source-to-structure simulation
    Zhang, Meng-Zhong
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Xiang-Chao
    Su, Wei
    Qiu, Yi-Xiang
    Wang, Jin-Ting
    Zhang, Chu-Han
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2023, 52 (03) : 593 - 608
  • [4] Seismic response analysis of the underground cavern group at the Yingliangbao hydropower station to the 2022 Ms 6.8 Luding earthquake
    Cao, Shiqi
    Zheng, Hong
    Jiang, Quan
    Li, Shaojun
    Xu, Dingping
    Chen, Tao
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 176
  • [5] Seismic damage investigation and analysis on rural buildings in the Ms 6.8 Luding Earthquake
    Chen Y.
    Dong J.
    Zhang F.
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43 (06): : 121 - 131and140
  • [6] Revisiting the seismic hazards of faults surrounding the 2022 Ms6.8 Luding earthquake, Sichuan, China
    Li, Yujiang
    Liu, Haoqing
    Yang, Cheng
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [7] Analysis of Seismic Impact on Hailuogou Glacier after the 2022 Luding Ms 6.8 Earthquake, China, Using SAR Offset Tracking Technology
    Li, Weile
    Chen, Junyi
    Lu, Huiyan
    Yu, Congwei
    Shan, Yunfeng
    Li, Zhigang
    Dong, Xiujun
    Xu, Qiang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [8] Coseismic deformation of the 2022 Luding MS6.8 earthquake and seismic potential along adjacent major faults
    Shan, Xinjian
    Li, Yanchuan
    Gao, Zhiyu
    Hua, Jun
    Huang, Xing
    Gong, Wenyu
    Qu, Chunyan
    Zhao, Dezheng
    Chen, Junxian
    Huang, Chuanchao
    Zhang, Yingfeng
    Zhang, Guohong
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN-CHINESE, 2023, 68 (08): : 944 - 953
  • [9] Seismicity changes and numerical simulation of coseismic deformation following the 2022 Ms6.8 Luding earthquake in Sichuan, China
    Meng, Qiu
    Wang, Zitao
    Zhang, Huai
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 67 (08) : 2507 - 2521
  • [10] Seismic damage investigation and analysis of energy-dissipated and seismically isolated buildings in Ms 6.8 Luding earthquake
    Pan Y.
    Gao H.
    Xiong Y.
    Wu X.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44 (12): : 122 - 136