Diagnostic accuracy of MRI-based PSA density for detection of prostate cancer among the Thai population

被引:1
作者
Aphinives, Chalida [1 ]
Nawapun, Supajit [1 ]
Tungnithiboon, Chutima [1 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, 123 Grp 16,Mittraparp Rd, Muang 40002, Khon Kaen Provi, Thailand
关键词
PSAD; PSA density; MRI-based PSAD; Prostate cancer; ANTIGEN DENSITY; GLEASON SCORE; RANGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12301-023-00335-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe PSAD calculating by the serum PSA level divided by prostate volume had more specificity and accuracy than the serum PSA level for detection of prostate cancer.MethodsMRI examinations of 319 patients who had suspected prostate cancer between January 2014 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Prostate volumes were measured by MRI images and PSAD values were calculated. The accuracy and optimal cutoff points of MRI-based PSAD were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves). Correlations between the MRI-based PSAD and Gleason scores were also analyzed to predict prognosis of prostate cancer.ResultsOverall, of 154 patients were included in this study, 59 patients (38.31%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer. The optimal cutoff point of PSAD was 0.16 (81.40% sensitivity, 54.70% specificity, 52.70% PPV, 82.50% NPV), and the AUC was 0.680 (95% CI: 0.609-0.751). In subgroup analyses, the optimal cutoff point of PSAD in patients with serum PSA 4-10 ng/ml was 0.16 (61.10% sensitivity, 76.00% specificity) and for > 10 ng/ml was 0.30 (68.30% sensitivity, 64.30% specificity). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant correlation between PSAD and Gleason scores (p-value 0.014).ConclusionsThe optimal cutoff point of MRI-based PSAD was 0.16 which was relatively different from international consensus.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical and economic impact of the introduction of pre-biopsy MRI-based assessment on a large prostate cancer centre diagnostic population and activity: 10 years on
    Orecchia, Luca
    Katz-Summercorn, Charles
    Grainger, Rebekah
    Fletcher, Peter
    Ippoliti, Simona
    Barrett, Tristan
    Kastner, Christof
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [42] Current results on PSA-based prostate cancer detection
    Graefen, M.
    Schlomm, T.
    Steuber, T.
    Sauter, G.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2014, 57 (03) : 312 - 317
  • [43] MRI-Based Prostate Volume-Adjusted Prostate-Specific Antigen in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Peng, Yahui
    Shen, Dinggang
    Liao, Shu
    Turkbey, Baris
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Wood, Bradford
    Karademir, Ibrahim
    Antic, Tatjana
    Yousef, Ambereen
    Jiang, Yulei
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Oto, Aytekin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (06) : 1733 - 1739
  • [44] Additional aids for the detection of prostate cancer? PSA density, PSA velocity, age-specific PSA reference ranges, and PSA in urine
    Pannek, J
    Brands, FH
    UROLOGE A, 2000, 39 (04): : 324 - 329
  • [45] Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population
    Ding, Kai
    Yao, Yong
    Gao, Yun
    Lu, Xudong
    Chen, Hongwei
    Tang, Qunfeng
    Hua, Chenchen
    Zhou, Ming
    Zun, Xinnong
    Yin, Qihua
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 118 : 138 - 146
  • [46] MRI-guided prostate radiation therapy planning: Investigation of dosimetric accuracy of MRI-based dose planning
    Lambert, Jonathan
    Greer, Peter B.
    Menk, Fred
    Patterson, Jackie
    Parker, Joel
    Dahl, Kara
    Gupta, Sanjiv
    Capp, Anne
    Wratten, Chris
    Tang, Colin
    Kumar, Mahesh
    Dowling, Jason
    Hauville, Sarah
    Hughes, Cynthia
    Fisher, Kristen
    Lau, Peter
    Denham, James W.
    Salvado, Olivier
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 (03) : 330 - 334
  • [47] Detection Accuracy of [ 68 Ga] PSMA PET/CT with Rising PSA in Prostate Cancer
    Mohan, Parul
    Wadhwa, Palak
    Mahajan, Harsh
    Kumar, Dileep
    Aringhieri, Giacomo
    Cioni, Dania
    WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [48] The impact of integrating PRIMARY score or SUVmax with MRI-based risk models for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Guo, Shikuan
    Ren, Jing
    Meng, Qingze
    Zhang, Boyuan
    Jiao, Jianhua
    Han, Donghui
    Wu, Peng
    Ma, Shuaijun
    Zhang, Jing
    Xing, Nianzeng
    Qin, Weijun
    Kang, Fei
    Zhang, Jingliang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2025, 52 (02) : 756 - 765
  • [49] Noninferiority of Monoparametric MRI Versus Multiparametric MRI for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Accuracy of ADC Ratios Based on Advanced "Zoomed" Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Raczeck, Paul
    Frenzel, Felix
    Woerner, Tobias
    Graeber, Stefan
    Bohle, Rainer M.
    Ziegler, Gesa
    Buecker, Arno
    Schneider, Guenther K.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2022, 57 (04) : 233 - 241
  • [50] Validation of an MRI-based prostate cancer prebiopsy Gleason score predictive nomogram
    Lee, Adrianna Jiaying
    Wnorowski, Amelia
    Ye, Nancy
    Xu, Linhan
    Naslund, Michael
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    CURRENT UROLOGY, 2022, 16 (01) : 38 - 43