Diagnostic accuracy of MRI-based PSA density for detection of prostate cancer among the Thai population

被引:1
作者
Aphinives, Chalida [1 ]
Nawapun, Supajit [1 ]
Tungnithiboon, Chutima [1 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, 123 Grp 16,Mittraparp Rd, Muang 40002, Khon Kaen Provi, Thailand
关键词
PSAD; PSA density; MRI-based PSAD; Prostate cancer; ANTIGEN DENSITY; GLEASON SCORE; RANGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12301-023-00335-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe PSAD calculating by the serum PSA level divided by prostate volume had more specificity and accuracy than the serum PSA level for detection of prostate cancer.MethodsMRI examinations of 319 patients who had suspected prostate cancer between January 2014 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Prostate volumes were measured by MRI images and PSAD values were calculated. The accuracy and optimal cutoff points of MRI-based PSAD were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves). Correlations between the MRI-based PSAD and Gleason scores were also analyzed to predict prognosis of prostate cancer.ResultsOverall, of 154 patients were included in this study, 59 patients (38.31%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer. The optimal cutoff point of PSAD was 0.16 (81.40% sensitivity, 54.70% specificity, 52.70% PPV, 82.50% NPV), and the AUC was 0.680 (95% CI: 0.609-0.751). In subgroup analyses, the optimal cutoff point of PSAD in patients with serum PSA 4-10 ng/ml was 0.16 (61.10% sensitivity, 76.00% specificity) and for > 10 ng/ml was 0.30 (68.30% sensitivity, 64.30% specificity). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant correlation between PSAD and Gleason scores (p-value 0.014).ConclusionsThe optimal cutoff point of MRI-based PSAD was 0.16 which was relatively different from international consensus.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] MRI at diagnostic versus confirmatory biopsy during MRI-based active surveillance of prostate cancer
    Marras, Madison
    Ellis, Jeffrey L.
    Copelan, Olivia
    Naha, Ushasi
    Han, Timothy
    Rac, Goran
    Quek, Marcus L.
    Gorbonos, Alex
    Woods, Michael E.
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    Gupta, Gopal N.
    Patel, Hiten D.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (10) : 331e1 - 331e6
  • [12] Predictors of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Study of PSA, PSA Density, and MRI Parameters
    Coskun, Mehmet
    Donmez, Emine Merve Horoz
    Akin, Yigit
    Ocal, Irfan
    Gumus, Cesur
    Uluc, Muhsin Engin
    ISTANBUL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 22 (01): : 31 - 37
  • [13] Restriction spectrum imaging improves MRI-based prostate cancer detection
    Kevin C. McCammack
    Natalie M. Schenker-Ahmed
    Nathan S. White
    Shaun R. Best
    Robert M. Marks
    Jared Heimbigner
    Christopher J. Kane
    J. Kellogg Parsons
    Joshua M. Kuperman
    Hauke Bartsch
    Rahul S. Desikan
    Rebecca A. Rakow-Penner
    Michael A. Liss
    Daniel J. A. Margolis
    Steven S. Raman
    Ahmed Shabaik
    Anders M. Dale
    David S. Karow
    Abdominal Radiology, 2016, 41 : 946 - 953
  • [14] Biparametric MRI-based radiomics classifiers for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10 ng/mL
    Lu, Yangbai
    Li, Binfei
    Huang, Hongxing
    Leng, Qu
    Wang, Qiang
    Zhong, Rui
    Huang, Yaqiang
    Li, Canyong
    Yuan, Runqiang
    Zhang, Yongxin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [15] Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway
    Sajjad, Wasiq
    Thankappannair, Vineetha
    Shah, Syed
    Ahmed, Adham
    Saeb-Parsy, Kasra
    Kastner, Christof
    Lamb, Benjamin
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024, 17 (04) : 412 - 418
  • [16] Re-evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of PSA as a referral test to detect clinically significant prostate cancer in contemporary MRI-based image-guided biopsy pathways
    Lophatananon, Artitaya
    Light, Alexander
    Burns-Cox, Nicholas
    Maccormick, Angus
    John, Joseph
    Otti, Vanessa
    McGrath, John
    Archer, Pete
    Anning, Jonathan
    McCracken, Stuart
    Page, Toby
    Muir, Ken
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2023, 16 (04) : 264 - 273
  • [17] Assessing the Impact of Transition and Peripheral Zone PSA Densities Over Whole-Gland PSA Density for Prostate Cancer Detection on Multiparametric MRI
    Esengur, Omer Tarik
    Stevenson, Emma
    Stecko, Hunter
    Lay, Nathan S.
    Yang, Dong
    Tetreault, Jesse
    Xu, Ziyue
    Xu, Daguang
    Yilmaz, Enis C.
    Gelikman, David G.
    Harmon, Stephanie A.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Baris
    PROSTATE, 2025, 85 (06) : 612 - 624
  • [18] Impact of Clinical Parameters on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Endorectal Coil MRI for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Colleselli, Daniela
    Hennenlotter, Joerg
    Schilling, David
    Krueger, Stefan A.
    Roethke, Mathias
    Lichy, Mathias P.
    Vogel, Ullrich
    Kuehs, Ursula
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Schwentner, Christian
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2011, 86 (04) : 393 - 398
  • [19] The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI for detection and localization of prostate cancer depends on the affected region
    Martins, Martina
    Regusci, Stefano
    Rohner, Stephane
    Szalay-Quinodoz, Ildiko
    De Boccard, Georges-Antoine
    Strom, Louise
    Hannink, Gerjon
    Ramos-Pascual, Sonia
    Rochat, Charles Henry
    BJUI COMPASS, 2021, 2 (03): : 178 - 187
  • [20] PSA-density does not improve bi-parametric prostate MR detection of prostate cancer in a biopsy naive patient population
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Rusconi, Giovanni
    Petretta, Mario
    Ponsiglione, Andrea
    Fusco, Ferdinando
    Longo, Nicola
    Persico, Francesco
    Cocozza, Sirio
    Brunetti, Arturo
    Imbriaco, Massimo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 104 : 64 - 70