A novel knowledge management method about integrated grounded theory for performance assessment of green building construction engineering

被引:2
作者
Bai, Xiaoping [1 ]
Liu, Wansong [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Management, Yanta Rd 13, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green construction management; building engineering; knowledge management; performance assessment; grounded theory;
D O I
10.1080/13467581.2022.2145206
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The green building construction is an important part of the green building, and setting up a suitable assessment model about green building construction engineering has great significance. This paper combined green construction and project management knowledge for performance assessment of green building construction engineering and used integrated method of grounded theory and G2 (G2 empowerment method) entropy method as a knowledge management strategy to build the performance assessment index set. Firstly, based on the existing literature and semi-structured interview data, grounded theory coding technology is used to identify the influencing factors of green construction performance to determine the assessment index set and corresponding assessment standards and formed the assessment index system. Then, the subjective and objective weighting methods are combined, and the G2 entropy method is used to carry out comprehensive weighting. This method has the advantages of comprehensive weighting and avoids the problem of how to allocate the proportion of subjective and objective weight in traditional comprehensive weighting. Finally, a novel knowledge management comprehensive method of performance assessment about green building construction engineering was presented. The detailed methods and steps presented in this paper can provide reference for performance assessment and knowledge management of green building construction engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:2309 / 2319
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GB506402010, P4
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 200661 CASBEENCB, P110
[3]  
Brink E., 2006, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, V1, P188, DOI [DOI 10.1080/17482620600881144, DOI 10.3402/QHW.V1I3.4932]
[4]  
Bronson, 2005, PUBLIC PERFORM MANAG, V28, P309, DOI [10.2307/3381156, DOI 10.2307/3381156]
[5]  
Dong N., 2020, SCI TECHNOLOGY MANAG, V40, P87
[6]  
ECD Energy and Environment, 1998, BREEAM BUILD ENV PER
[7]   GLASER,BG - DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY [J].
EDGINGTO.ES .
CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGIST-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 1967, A 8 (04) :360-&
[8]   The objects of technology assessment. Hermeneutic extension of consequentialist reasoning [J].
Grunwald, Armin .
JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2020, 7 (01) :96-112
[9]  
Guo X.G., 1994, FINANCE TRADE RES, V6, P56
[10]   Application of the analytical hierarchy process in the selection of desalination plants [J].
Hajeeh, M ;
Al-Othman, A .
DESALINATION, 2005, 174 (01) :97-108