Does the US regional greenhouse gas initiative affect green innovation?

被引:4
作者
Rahman, Md Azizur [1 ]
Ahmad, Rubi [1 ]
Ismail, Izlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Business & Econ, Dept Finance, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
Market-based mechanism; Emission Trading Scheme (ETS); Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI); Firms' green innovation; Porter Hypothesis; Fortune; 500; Difference-in-Difference; Propensity Score Matching based DID; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; PRODUCT INNOVATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TRADING SYSTEM; ECO-INNOVATION; EMISSIONS; IMPACT; COMPANIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-23189-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study measures the impact of the implementation of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) on firms' green innovation initiatives. We used 20 years of panel data from the Fortune 500 list of the US largest companies. Based on DID, a benchmark regression, the RGGI has a significant adverse effect on the green innovation of Fortune 500 companies, and we verified these findings with multiple robustness tests. As we investigate how energy-intensive industries were affected by RGGI, we found that it slowed down green innovation, but it was not statistically significant. This study provides a novel perspective on how the RGGI influences green innovation in firms and how different types of sectors respond to the policy. The findings indicate that the "weak" Porter Hypothesis has not been confirmed in the present carbon trading market (particularly the RGGI) for Fortune 500 firms in the USA. In terms of policy, we believe that a well-covered and differentiated legislation that fosters green innovation while being realistic about the policy's goal and the firm's environmental attitude, like emissions reduction through green innovation, is essential.
引用
收藏
页码:15689 / 15707
页数:19
相关论文
共 131 条
  • [1] Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects
    Abadie, Alberto
    Imbens, Guido W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2011, 29 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [2] The Environment and Directed Technical Change
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Aghion, Philippe
    Bursztyn, Leonardo
    Hemous, David
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) : 131 - 166
  • [3] Agency EP, 2017, SOURC GREENH GAS EM
  • [4] Agency EP, 2020, INV US GREENH GAS EM
  • [5] European Industrial Energy Intensity: Innovation, Environmental Regulation, and Price Effects
    Ajayi, Victor
    Reiner, David
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (04) : 105 - 128
  • [6] The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
    Ambec, Stefan
    Cohen, Mark A.
    Elgie, Stewart
    Lanoie, Paul
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) : 2 - 22
  • [7] Corporate governance and green innovation
    Amore, Mario Daniele
    Bennedsen, Morten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 75 : 54 - 72
  • [8] Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
  • [9] Anser MK, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P51105, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-14243-4
  • [10] The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy consumption, financial development, and CO2 emissions: evidence from selected Asian countries
    Anwar, Ahsan
    Sinha, Avik
    Sharif, Arshian
    Siddique, Muhammad
    Irshad, Shoaib
    Anwar, Waseem
    Malik, Summaira
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (05) : 6556 - 6576