Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Sharma, Chanderdeep [1 ,2 ]
Sharma, Shikha [2 ]
Soni, Anjali [2 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Bilaspur, India
[2] Dr Rajendra Prasad Govt Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Kangra, India
关键词
cesarean delivery; cosmetic outcome; poliglecaprone-25; polyglactin-910; surgical site infections; SUTURE MATERIALS; INFECTION; SECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101256
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Cesarean delivery is a commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide. There is limited good -quality evidence regarding subcuticular skin closure with absorbable sutures in transverse incisions after cesarean delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare poliglecaprone-25 (3-0) and polyglactin-910 (4-0) sutures for subcuticular skin closure in Pfannenstiel incisions among women undergoing cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: In this double-blind, single -center, randomized controlled trial among women undergoing cesarean delivery (elective and emergency), 200 women were randomized (Group 1-subcuticular skin closure with poliglecaprone-25 [3-0] vs Group 2-subcuticular skin closure with polyglactin-910 [4-0]). All women received similar preoperative and postoperative care. A sample size of 200 women was selected with the aim of reducing the composite wound complication rate from 15.8% to 3.6% with a power of 0.80 and a 2 -tailed a of 0.05. Thus, 90 women were required in each group, but 100 were selected to account for attrition. RESULTS: Composite wound complications (including surgical site infection, hematoma, seroma, need for resuturing or readmission for wound complications) were similar in the 2 groups (Group 1 vs 2: 16 vs 10; P=.293; relative risk, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.79). Surgical site infection (8 vs 7; P=1.000; relative risk, 1.08; 95% confi- dence interval, 0.64-1.83), hematoma (1 vs 2; P=.561; relative risk, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-3.31), seroma (8 vs 2; P=.052; relative risk, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.33), need for resuturing (4 vs 3; P=.700; relative risk, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 -2.22), and need for readmission (4 vs 4; P=1.000) were similar in the 2 groups. Pain score on the visual analog scale at 3 days (3.2 +/- 1.0 vs 3.6 +/- 1.2) and 6 weeks after operation (1.6 +/- 0.8 vs 1.7 +/- 0.9;) was significantly lower in Group 1 (P=.023 and P=.033, respectively). There was no difference between observer and patient scar assessment scores measured at 6 weeks after operation (P=.069 and P=.431, respectively). CONCLUSION: Poliglecaprone-25 (3-0) and polyglactin-910 (4-0) subcuticular sutures were comparable regarding composite wound complications (surgical site infection, hematoma, seroma, wound separation or re -suturing, need for readmission) and cosmetic appearance (patient scar assessment score & observer scar assessment score) related to skin closure among women undergoing cesarean delivery through a Pfannenstiel incision in nonobese women (average body mass index, 25).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Poliglecaprone-25 and Polyglactin-910 in Cutaneous Surgery
    Regan, Thomas
    Lawrence, Naomi
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2013, 39 (09) : 1340 - 1344
  • [2] Skin closure at cesarean delivery, glue vs subcuticular sutures: a randomized controlled trial
    Daykan, Yair
    Sharon-Weiner, Maya
    Pasternak, Yael
    Tzadikevitch-Geffen, Keren
    Markovitch, Ofer
    Sukenik-Halevy, Rivka
    Biron-Shental, Tal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (04)
  • [3] Rapidly Absorbing Polyglactin 910 Versus Poliglecaprone 25 for Laceration Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Morrell, Lindsay Helene
    Clark, Stephanie Marie Glass
    Morrell, Christopher
    Carroll, Ashley Woodward
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 190S - 190S
  • [4] A randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery
    Basha, Suzanne
    Rochon, Meredith
    Quinones, Joanne
    Coassolo, Kara
    Rust, Orion
    Smulian, John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S4 - S4
  • [5] Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery
    Basha, Suzanne L.
    Rochon, Meredith L.
    Quinones, Joanne N.
    Coassolo, Kara M.
    Rust, Orion A.
    Smulian, John C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (03) : 285.e1 - 285.e8
  • [6] Comparison of efficacy of three suture materials, i.e., poliglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910, polyamide, as subcuticular skin stitches in post-cesarean women: A randomized clinical trial
    Vats U.
    Pandit Suchitra N.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2014, 64 (1) : 14 - 18
  • [7] Skin closure at cesarean section, polypropylene versus polyglactin 910: a randomized controlled study
    Koroglu, Nadiye
    Yuksel, Ilkbal Temel
    Cetin, Berna Aslan
    Aytufan, Zubeyde
    Deniz, Necip
    Akca, Aysu
    Yildirim, Gonca Yetkin
    Yuksel, Aytac
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (06): : 1088 - 1092
  • [8] Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials
    Clay, Felix S. H.
    Walsh, Colin A.
    Walsh, Stewart R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (05) : 378 - 383
  • [9] Randomized trial of surgical staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery
    Figueroa, Dana
    Paisley, Rachel
    Chapman-Jauk, Victoria
    Szychowski, Jeffrey
    Hauth, John
    Tita, Alan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S290 - S290
  • [10] Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Buresch, Arin M.
    Van Arsdale, Anne
    Ferzli, Myriam
    Sahasrabudhe, Nicole
    Sun, Mengyang
    Bernstein, Jeffrey
    Bernstein, Peter S.
    Ngai, Ivan M.
    Garry, David J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (03): : 521 - 526