Evaluation of laboratory and on-farm tests to estimate colostrum quality for dairy cows

被引:5
|
作者
Roeder, M. [1 ]
Borchardt, S. [1 ]
Heuwieser, W. [1 ]
Rauch, E. [2 ]
Sargent, R. [3 ]
Sutter, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Fac Vet Med, Clin Anim Reprod, Konigsweg 65, D-14163 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Vet Med, Unit Anim Welf Behav Sci Anim Hyg & Husb, Vet Str 13-R, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[3] Saskatoon Colostrum Co Ltd, Saskatoon, SK S7K 6A2, Canada
关键词
colostrum quality; on-farm test; colostrum management; IMMUNOGLOBULIN-G CONCENTRATION; BOVINE COLOSTRUM; RADIAL IMMUNODIFFUSION; BRIX REFRACTOMETRY; IGG CONCENTRATION; PASSIVE-IMMUNITY; MANAGEMENT; ELISA; CALF; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2023-23467
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to evaluate differ-ent analytical methods to determine colostrum quality in dairy cattle, including one laboratory-based method (ELISA) and 4 on-farm tests. We hypothesized that the colostral IgG concentration using different analytical methods, such as ELISA (mg/mL), digital Brix refrac-tometer (% Brix), colostrometer (specific gravity and mg/mL), an outflow funnel (seconds), and a lateral flow assay (mg/mL), were highly correlated with the reference method, radial immunodiffusion (RID; mg/ mL) and would generate comparable results. Colostrum samples were collected from 209 Holstein Friesian cows on 2 commercial dairy farms in Germany. Colostrum weight and colostrum temperature were measured. Test characteristics, such as optimum thresholds, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were de-termined using a receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for each test. Out of 209 colostrum samples assessed by RID, 186 (89%) samples had high quality (> 50 mg IgG/mL), while 23 colostrum samples (11%) showed poor quality with IgG concentrations less than 50 mg/mL. The mean IgG concentration (+SD) was 101.3 + 45.9 mg/mL and the range was 6.0 to 244.3 mg/mL. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between RID and ELISA was r = 0.78. In comparison to RID, Pearson correlation coefficients for the on-farm tests were: r = 0.79 (digital Brix refractometry), r = 0.58 (colostrometer: specific gravity), r = 0.61 (colostrom-eter: temperature corrected), r = 0.26 (outflow funnel) and r = 0.43 (lateral flow assay), respectively. The op-timal threshold to identify high-quality colostrum using ELISA was 50.8 mg/mL with sensitivity 91.3%, speci-ficity 92.3%, and AUC of 0.94. For the on-farm tests sensitivity ranged from 95.7% (Brix refractometry) to 60.9% (lateral flow assay). Specificity ranged from 88.6% (lateral flow assay) to 75.9% (colostrometer: temperature corrected). The AUC ranged from 0.93 (Brix refractometry) to 0.73 (outflow funnel). Based on the AUC, ELISA (0.94) and Brix refractometry (0.93) can be considered highly accurate. In conclusion, the ELISA is accurate to assess colostrum quality. Regard-ing the on-farm tests only the digital Brix refractom-eter and the colostrometer were adequate to determine colostrum quality.
引用
收藏
页码:9164 / 9173
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [21] BRIX REFRACTOMETRY OF COLOSTRUM FROM PRIMIPAROUS DAIRY COWS AND NEW-BORN CALF BLOOD SERUM IN THE EVALUATION OF FAILURE OF PASSIVE TRANSFER
    Stojic, Milica
    Fratric, Natalija
    Kovacic, Marijana
    Ilic, Vesna
    Gvozdic, Dragan
    Savic, Olivera
    Dokovic, Radojica
    Valcic, Olivera
    ACTA VETERINARIA-BEOGRAD, 2017, 67 (04): : 508 - 524
  • [22] Nationwide evaluation of quality and composition of colostrum on dairy farms in the United States
    Morrill, K. M.
    Conrad, E.
    Lago, A.
    Campbell, J.
    Quigley, J.
    Tyler, H.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (07) : 3997 - 4005
  • [23] Comparison of selected data acquisition models using on-farm production records on qualitative parameters of oocytes in dairy cows
    Stadnik, Ludek
    Kinterova, Veronika
    Sichtar, Jiri
    Duchacek, Jaromir
    Gasparik, Matus
    Nemcova, Lucie
    Prochazka, Radek
    Codl, Radim
    CZECH JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 69 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [24] Comparison of four semi-quantitative tests for evaluation of colostrum quality in Saanen goats
    Kacar, Y.
    Mecitoglu, Z.
    Topal, O.
    Batmaz, H.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 51 (05) : 657 - 663
  • [25] Supplementation with Lentinan Improves the Colostrum Quality of Holstein Dairy Cows and the Immunity and Antioxidant Capacity of Newborn Calves
    Huang, Yinghao
    Hu, Yapeng
    Lv, Longfei
    Wang, Dian
    Li, Xiao
    Liu, Sijia
    Zhuo, Zhao
    Fan, Caiyun
    Cheng, Jianbo
    ANIMALS, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [26] Associations of production characteristics with the on-farm presence of Fasciola hepatica in dairy cows vary across production levels and indicate differences between breeds
    Oehm, Andreas W.
    Zablotski, Yury
    Hoedemaker, Martina
    Campe, Amely
    Strube, Christina
    Jordan, Daniela
    Springer, Andrea
    Klawitter, Markus
    Knubben-Schweizer, Gabriela
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [27] Effects of dry period length on milk production, health, fertility, and quality of colostrum in dairy cows. Invited review
    Mansfeld, R.
    Sauter-Louis, C.
    Martin, R.
    TIERAERZTLICHE PRAXIS AUSGABE GROSSTIERE NUTZTIERE, 2012, 40 (04): : 239 - 250
  • [28] Metabolic profile of prepartum dairy cows and its influence on the immediate postpartum period, colostrum quality and passive immunity transference
    Hoffmann, D. A. C.
    Furtado, M.
    Araujo, G. de M.
    Braganca, L. F.
    Moreira, F.
    Rabassa, V. R.
    Feijo, J. O.
    Correa, M. N.
    Peripolli, V.
    Schwegler, E.
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2024, 308
  • [29] Pattern of milk yield and immunoglobulin concentration and factors associated with colostrum quality at the quarter level in dairy cows after parturition
    Kessler, E. C.
    Pistol, G. C.
    Bruckmaier, R. M.
    Gross, J. J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (01) : 965 - 971
  • [30] Evaluation of urine excretion from dairy cows under two farm systems using urine sensors
    Shepherd, M.
    Shorten, P.
    Costall, D.
    Macdonald, K. A.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 236 : 285 - 294