The agency domain and behavioral interactions: assessing positive animal welfare using the Five Domains Model

被引:13
作者
Littlewood, Katherine E. [1 ]
Heslop, Morgan V. [1 ]
Cobb, Mia L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Anim Welf Sci & Bioeth Ctr, Sch Vet Sci, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[2] Univ Melbourne, Fac Sci, Anim Welf Sci Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
agency; animal welfare; positive animal welfare; positive affective engagement; quality of life; good life; happiness; animal wellbeing; DOGS; ENRICHMENT; EMOTIONS; CONSCIOUSNESS; OPPORTUNITIES; ENVIRONMENT; STATES; NEEDS; PLAY;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2023.1284869
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Animal welfare denotes how an animal experiences their life. It represents the overall mental experiences of an animal and is a subjective concept that cannot be directly measured. Instead, welfare indicators are used to cautiously infer mental experiences from resource provisions, management factors, and animal-based measures. The Five Domains Model is a holistic and structured framework for collating these indicators and assessing animal welfare. Contemporary approaches to animal welfare management consider how animals can be given opportunities to have positive experiences. However, the uncertainty surrounding positive mental experiences that can be inferred has resulted in risk-averse animal welfare scientists returning to the relative safety of positivism. This has meant that aspects of positive welfare are often referred to as animal 'wants'. Agency is a concept that straddles the positivist-affective divide and represents a way forward for discussions about positive welfare. Agency is the capacity of individual animals to engage in voluntary, self-generated, and goal-directed behavior that they are motivated to perform. Discrete positive emotions are cautiously inferred from these agentic experiences based on available knowledge about the animal's motivation for engaging in the behavior. Competence-building agency can be used to evaluate the potential for positive welfare and is represented by the Behavioral Interactions domain of the Five Domains Model. In 2020, The Model was updated to, amongst other things, include consideration of human-animal interactions. The most important aspect of this update was the renaming of Domain 4 from "Behavior" to "Behavioral Interactions" and the additional detail added to allow this domain's purpose to be clearly understood to represent an animal's opportunities to exercise agency. We illustrate how the Behavioral Interactions domain of The Model can be used to assess animals' competence-building agency and positive welfare. In this article, we use the examples of sugar gliders housed in captivity and greyhounds that race to illustrate how the agentic qualities of choice, control, and challenge can be used to assess opportunities for animals to exercise agency and experience positive affective engagement.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [11] Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare
    Mellor, David J.
    ANIMALS, 2017, 7 (08):
  • [12] Using the Five Domains Model to Assess the Adverse Impacts of Husbandry, Veterinary, and Equitation Interventions on Horse Welfare
    McGreevy, Paul
    Berger, Jeannine
    de Brauwere, Nic
    Doherty, Orla
    Harrison, Anna
    Fiedler, Julie
    Jones, Claudia
    McDonnell, Sue
    McLean, Andrew
    Nakonechny, Lindsay
    Nicol, Christine
    Preshaw, Liane
    Thomson, Peter
    Tzioumis, Vicky
    Webster, John
    Wolfensohn, Sarah
    Yeates, James
    Jones, Bidda
    ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [13] Practical Application of the Five Domains Animal Welfare Framework for Supply Food Animal Chain Managers
    Grandin, Temple
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (20):
  • [14] Changes in the Welfare of an Injured Working Farm Dog Assessed Using the Five Domains Model
    Littlewood, Katherine E.
    Mellor, David J.
    ANIMALS, 2016, 6 (09):
  • [15] Circus Animal Welfare: analysis through a five-domain approach
    Mota-Rojas, Daniel
    Ghezzi, Marcelo Daniel
    Dominguez-Oliva, Adriana
    de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo
    Boscato-Funes, Luciano
    Torres-Bernal, Fabiola
    Mora-Medina, Patricia
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR AND BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2022, 10 (03): : 1 - 12
  • [16] Two Domains to Five: Advancing Veterinary Duty of Care to Fulfil Public Expectations of Animal Welfare Expertise
    Littlewood, Katherine E.
    Beausoleil, Ngaio J.
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [17] A systematic review o f the potential uses of on-animal sensors to monitor the welfare of sheep evaluated using the Five Domains Model as a framework
    Fogarty, E. S.
    Swain, D. L.
    Cronin, G. M.
    Trotter, M.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2019, 28 (04) : 407 - 420
  • [18] Contemplating the Five Domains model of animal welfare assessment: UK horse owner perceptions of equine well-being
    Fletcher, K. A.
    Cameron, L. J.
    Freeman, M.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2021, 30 (03) : 259 - 268
  • [19] Mutual interactions between cognition and welfare: The horse as an animal model
    Hausberger, M.
    Stomp, M.
    Sankey, C.
    Brajon, S.
    Lunel, C.
    Henry, S.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2019, 107 : 540 - 559
  • [20] Human animal relationships in Bos indicus cattle breeds addressed from a Five Domains welfare framework
    Mota-Rojas, Daniel
    Whittaker, Alexandra L.
    Strappini, Ana C.
    Orihuela, Agustin
    Dominguez-Oliva, Adriana
    Mora-Medina, Patricia
    alvarez-Macias, Adolfo
    Hernandez-Avalos, Ismael
    Olmos-Hernandez, Adriana
    Reyes-Sotelo, Brenda
    Grandin, Temple
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11