Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review

被引:17
作者
Lovatti, Sofia [1 ,2 ]
Tiecco, Giorgio [1 ,2 ]
Mule, Alice [1 ,2 ]
Rossi, Luca [1 ,2 ]
Sforza, Anita [1 ,2 ]
Salvi, Martina [1 ,2 ]
Signorini, Liana [3 ]
Castelli, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Quiros-Roldan, Eugenia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, Dept Clin & Expt Sci, Unit Infect & Trop Dis, I-25123 Brescia, Italy
[2] ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, I-25123 Brescia, Italy
[3] ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Unit Infect & Trop Dis, I-25123 Brescia, Italy
关键词
dalbavancin; DBV; osteomyelitis; spondylodiscitis; arthritis; osteoarticular infections; bone; joints; Gram-positive; Systematic review; review; RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; NATIVE VERTEBRAL OSTEOMYELITIS; IN-VITRO ACTIVITY; ANTIBIOTIC-TREATMENT; BIOFILMS;
D O I
10.3390/ph16071005
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Background: Approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, dalbavancin (DBV) has gradually acquired over the years a role as an off-label treatment for several infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria even in other anatomical sites. Osteoarticular (OA) infections are one of the most difficult-to-treat infections and, since the absence of recommendations, clinicians use different and heterogenic DBV dosing schedule regimens for the off-label treatment of osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, and septic arthritis. Our aim is to systematically review the current literature to describe DBV administration schedules and their outcome in OA infections. Methods: According to the 2020 updated PRISMA guidelines, all peer-reviewed articles regarding the use of DBV in OA infections were included. We conducted a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trials. Results: A total of 23 studies and 450 patients were included, prevalently male (144/195, 73.8%) and diabetic (53/163, 32.5%). Overall, 280 (280/388, 72.2%) osteomyelitis, 79 (79/388, 20.4%) spondylodiscitis, and 29 (29/388, 7.5%) septic arthritis were considered. Staphylococcus aureus (164/243, 67.5%) was the most common pathogen isolated. A previous treatment failure (45/96, 46.9%) was the main reason for a switch to a long-acting antibiotic. Most patients were successfully cured with DBV (318/401, 79.3%). A source control was performed in most patients with a favourable outcome (80.4%), while MRSA was prevalently isolated in people with an unfavourable outcome (57%). While a higher percentage of success was found in people who received three doses of DBV 1 week apart (92.3%), a higher rate of treatment failure was recorded in cases of when the DBV cycle was composed of less than two or more than four doses (27.8%). Conclusions: DBV has shown to be effective as a treatment for OA infections. The most favourable outcome was found in patients receiving three doses of DBV and with an adequate surgical management prior to antibiotic treatment. Although a rigorous administration schedule does not exist, DBV is a viable treatment option in the management of OA infections.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   In vitro activity of daptomycin combined with dalbavancin and linezolid, and dalbavancin with linezolid against MRSA strains [J].
Aktas, Gulseren ;
Derbentli, Sengul .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (02) :441-443
[2]   Dalbavancin for the management of osteomyelitis: a major step forward? [J].
Almangour, Thamer A. ;
Alhifany, Abdullah A. .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 75 (10) :2717-2722
[3]   Dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults: A retrospective matched cohort study [J].
Almangour, Thamer A. ;
Perry, Gregory K. ;
Alhifany, Abdullah A. .
SAUDI PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 28 (04) :460-464
[4]   Dalbavancin for the management of gram-positive osteomyelitis: Effectiveness and potential utility [J].
Almangour, Thamer A. ;
Perry, Gregory K. ;
Terriff, Colleen M. ;
Alhifany, Abdullah A. ;
Kaye, Keith S. .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 93 (03) :213-218
[5]  
Almangour TA, 2017, AM J CASE REP, V18, DOI 10.12659/AJCR.905930
[6]   In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of the glycopeptide dalbavancin [J].
Andes, David ;
Craig, William A. .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 51 (05) :1633-1642
[7]   The role of dalbavancin for Gram positive infections in the COVID-19 era: state of the art and future perspectives [J].
Andreoni, Massimo ;
Bassetti, Matteo ;
Corrao, Salvatore ;
De Rosa, Francesco Giuseppe ;
Esposito, Vincenzo ;
Falcone, Marco ;
Grossi, Paolo ;
Pea, Federico ;
Petrosillo, Nicola ;
Tascini, Carlo ;
Venditti, Mario ;
Viale, Pierluigi .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2021, 19 (09) :1125-1134
[8]   Activity of dalbavancin, alone and in combination with rifampicin, against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a foreign-body infection model [J].
Baldoni, Daniela ;
Tafin, Ulrika Furustrand ;
Aeppli, Sandrine ;
Angevaare, Eline ;
Oliva, Alessandra ;
Haschke, Manuel ;
Zimmerli, Werner ;
Trampuz, Andrej .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2013, 42 (03) :220-225
[9]   Dalbavancin in Real Life: Economic Impact of Prescription Timing in French Hospitals [J].
Beraud, Guillaume ;
Maupetit, Jean-Claude ;
Darras, Audric ;
Vimont, Alexandre ;
Blachier, Martin .
INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND THERAPY, 2022, 11 (01) :435-449
[10]   2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis in Adultsa [J].
Berbari, Elie F. ;
Kanj, Souha S. ;
Kowalski, Todd J. ;
Darouiche, Rabih O. ;
Widmer, Andreas F. ;
Schmitt, Steven K. ;
Hendershot, Edward F. ;
Holtom, Paul D. ;
Huddleston, Paul M. ;
Petermann, Gregory W. ;
Osmon, Douglas R. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 61 (06) :E26-E46